What a terrible tragedy. And yet how brave of the brother jumping in to save the other! We will certainly keep them and their families in our family rosary.

Good Fr. Rusak!

Fr. Rusak had also daringly posted a strongly critical commentary under his own name on The Angelus book site's comment section regarding a fellow SSPX priest's notorious book.  The book was Fr. Robinson's The Realist Guide to Religion and Science. In spite of the politeness, not to mention the objective correctness of the commentary, it was removed from the site within a matter of days while I think all the "cheerleading" commentaries were left up.

From an old CathInfo thread.
https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/sspx-priest-publicly-smashes-fr-paul-robinson's-(sspx)-book/
"...
Failure to consider all the evidence
Father Gerard Rusak, FSSPX, Nov 2018

While Father Robinson excels on philosophical points in the first six chapters of his book (1 star), he accepts the unproven hypotheses of the Big Bang (with its long ages needed for evolution) and he rashly embraces heliocentrism. Meanwhile, he brushes aside those who do not agree with him using insufficient arguments (see below). His interpretation of the Bible is more in accord with a liberal interpretation of Vatican II's Dei Verbum #11 rather than with the traditional teaching of the Church on the inerrant nature of Holy Scripture. This allows him to pick and choose among facts related in the book of Genesis and elsewhere in the Bible. He also ignores the longstanding the decrees of the Church against Galileo and the unanimous teaching of the Fathers of the Church these same questions. On these last issues, his insufficient arguments have been completely refuted by a book by Robert Sungenis: "Scientific Heresies and Their Effect on the Church" (564 pages).

I thank the Angelus Press in advance for posting this review and request them to add to their list of books the above book of Robert Sungenis so that both sides of the question may be heard. Or should they not wish to do so, to withdraw Father Robinson's book from sale from this their website.
I may add that I know other SSPX priests and faithful like myself who are shocked at the publication of this book for at least some if not all, of the above reasons.
..."

He probably can't do that, in that the Constitution mandates a census every ten years.  That said, he could maintain that the 2020 census was flawed and inaccurate, and that his proposed census is not a new one, but rather a do-over of the 2020 census.  Whether a court would uphold that or not would depend upon the thinking of the particular judge, or in the case of SCOTUS, that of a majority of the justices.

https://www.axios.com/2025/08/07/trump-new-census-order-constitution-text

I'm betting the argument is this:  The Constitution requires a census every 10 years.  But does it forbid us from doing an additional one?  

He probably can't do that, in that the Constitution mandates a census every ten years.  That said, he could maintain that the 2020 census was flawed and inaccurate, and that his proposed census is not a new one, but rather a do-over of the 2020 census.  Whether a court would uphold that or not would depend upon the thinking of the particular judge, or in the case of SCOTUS, that of a majority of the justices.

https://www.axios.com/2025/08/07/trump-new-census-order-constitution-text