Stanley is better with the actual science stuff than I am. But he brings up a very good point when it comes to losing technology. Humanity loses technology all the time. The ingredients for super durable Roman concrete is still unknown, even though we have samples of it everywhere. Another good example is Greek fire. We don't even know how the Pyramids were built. 
Sometimes civilizations decide to simply stop using highly advanced technology, either because of money or just because they don't need it anymore. A more modern example is the SR-71. It was a spyplane used during the ColdWar that remains one of the fastest and most technologically advanced aircraft known to man. Its first flight was in 1964 and its last flight was in 1999. We stopped using it because it was too expensive to fly and upgrade, not to mention internal military politics. There were even supersonic recon drones in the late 60s. We can barely do that now.

Surely many of you have seen this short video.   Look, folks, the Moon Landings were a giant hoax.  I don't know who or what Stanley represents, but his comments I find bewildering.

If the loss of technology has been discussed many times, I failed to get in on it, even on CI. That NASA officials themselves admit that we have never gotten above lower space orbit; that we have no yet solved the radiation problem, etc.  I simply take them at their word.  The Apollo program was one giant lie for mankind.

OK. When people say the technology was lost, it was lost due to funding cuts under the Nixon administration. Manufacturing places that made tools and parts for Apollo switched to make other things. The ability to make more disappeared. Additionally, people who did the work, either at NASA or at various engineering contractors, switch to work on other things.

These were people with practical, operational knowledge (aka tacit knowledge) built up during tests in the 1960s, including details of subsystems. "Try SCE to AUX' was such specific knowledge that probably nobody else even in mission control at the time knew what why the recommendation from that one engineer might fix a particular problem that risked aborting Apollo 12. Also, like any design that isn't mass-produced, the actual build is a little different from the blueprints, and some people knew those differences. Thus, once people moved to new tasks, it was not a simple task of building another one from the blueprints and using it. Furthermore, technology does change, and so available alloys and other materials change properties. Even when for the better, they still involve redesign. So, in time, the whole craft needs to be redesigned to accommodate different materials.

On to a couple main points in the video.

Someone in the video says radiation needed to be solved for Orion, even though it had been solved for Apollo. Well, the astronauts WERE quarantined after each flight, and were tested for radiation, etc. They were almost all test pilots - willing to risk death. They were also willing to risk some cancer, though it turned out the engineers had done a good job. Furthermore, Orion is intended to be a crew capsule not just for a brief lunar mission, but for longer term missions including to Mars. Thus it has different requirements, and radiation issues had to be solved for Orion.

The narrator also claims that the temperatures in the thermosphere would melt the spacecraft. We have spacecraft in orbit now. Some of them (eg, the ISS) can be seen at night. Clearly these spacecraft survived. They handled the temperature because temperature is not the key value, but heat transfer. If you put your hand in 212 degree boiling water, you get scalded immediately, but you can put your hands in the air in a 400 degree oven for a while. The outer atmosphere may have a high temperature (meaning particles have high velocity), but it's practically a vacuum (meaning few particles). Vacuums are very good insulators - that's what a thermos has.

Sean, the website is, Virgo-Maria.org

Hello Cosmas-

I couldn't get any of the links you supplied to open.

Are you able to point me toward the website you copied the OP from, so that I can translate it?