'What Coverup?'  WHO refuses to acknowledge China early censorship of outbreak

Zerohedge

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-live-who-team-delivers-first-report-mission-wuhan?utm_campaign=&utm_content=ZeroHedge%3A+The+Durden+Dispatch&utm_medium=email&utm_source=zh_newsletter

Yeah, it's probably worth stocking up on non-perishables even if you aren't afraid of the virus itself. Better safe than sorry.

No doubt.  I'm incurring some debt to do so.  The economic impact is already a foregone conclusion due to the Chinese supply chain interruptions.

Yes. This makes it, imo, a mortal sin of omission to fail to support President Trump's bid for re-election in 2020. The reason being that abortion is sure to be outlawed if President Trump wins another term. The facts on federal judges alone make it statistically certain. A young, conservative, pro-life majority that will shape the American Judiciary for decades to come is being formed. Vote for and support it and be a part of the coming pro-life victory.

Another Article from Axios: https://www.axios.com/trump-mcconnell-judge-confirmations-senate-8b5087fd-5fd1-4846-8a1c-cadf888bf18b.html

Trump and McConnell continue to transform the federal judiciary


Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

After three years in office, President Trump and the Republican-held Senate have installed a total of 187 judges to the federal bench, with Trump nominees now making up one in four U.S. circuit court judges, according to an analysis by the Washington Post.
Why it matters: Trump's transformation of the federal judiciary will ensure that it maintains a conservative tilt for decades, likely affecting future progressive legislation and priorities no matter the outcome of next November’s election.
By the numbers: Trump has so far appointed two Supreme Court justices and 50 judges on the 13 U.S. circuit courts. By comparison, Obama appointed two Supreme Court justices and 55 circuit judges during the entirety of his two terms.

Between the lines: The president and Senate Republicans selected younger conservatives for lifetime appointments to ensure that their impact is felt years after the Trump administration, according to the Washington Post.
Of note: While the House voted to impeach the president last week, the Senate confirmed an additional 13 district court judges.
What's next: Trump and Senate Republicans have only one circuit court vacancy left to fill this year. More could open up next year, and there will certainly be vacancies in Trump's second term if he wins in November.

I will try to find the reference for what I said above.

You define "invincibly ignorant" as a permanent state, while I would define it as a temporary state.  How can anyone be invincibly ignorant forever?  Does not Christ "enlighten every man who comes into the world" (John 1)?  Is God unable to conquer invincible ignorance?
.
Secondly, where does the Church give us a definition for invincible ignorance?  Oh right, there is none.  So it's an abstract idea which everyone can interpret their own way.  What madness!  If the Church hasn't defined it, so all catholics can understand it the same way, then it's not a catholic term and shouldn't be used when discussing theology.
.
Finally, you keep using this anti-Catholic term, yet you have not admitted that Bl Pius IX was quoted out-of-context in his statement where he mentions it.  He later clarified his view, but the modernists who surrounded him had already spread the original mistake far and wide.  Do you or do you not accept Bl Pius IX's correction?

It's an anti-Catholic term, but Pius IX used it. Yeah right.

Your first paragraph asks complex issues. I'm not going to write a thesis on this, so don't make a fuss that I haven't included all the distinctions. But yes, I think God could overcome invincible ignorance by way of a miracle. This is not meant to be a statement about the relationship between grace and free will.

Has the Church defined "blood", "outside", "without"? No. We are capable of understanding ordinary words.

I am not aware of any statement of the Church prior to V2 that I do not accept.