This is a thread about safe-guarding children. You are free to go to another thread if my concern bothers you that much.
Below is Boru's very first post. Note how much time she spends talking about "canonical" things and using inside baseball words like "liacised" and ordination "validity." All the while, she's just a little homeschool mom in Ireland who takes care of dogs and horses and her husband, while staying up at all hours of the night posting on Internet forums.
And, of course, the elephant in the room, the suggestions of impropriety by Moran, Williamson, Vigano. Which is very much the focus of her comments in that FIRST post. In other words, Boru is obsessed with "who is to blame," not with "safe-guarding children."
If "safe-guarding children" was her main concern, why would she even bring up all the canonical stuff? Why not just say the "Moran has a history. Be careful with your children." and leave it at that? Why did she feel the need IN HER VERY FIRST POST on Cathinfo, to launch into a canonical witch trial to find the episcopal culprits in the Resistance who were purportedly behind the Moran "ordination."
Her evidence of Moran's guilt is that "an innocent man, who cared about the faithful, would never insert himself into the homes of young children until he name about been formerly cleared." What if the accusation was false? How is the man going to clear himself of a (possibly) false accusation when the accusers are NuChurch fake priests themselves?
Remember, Jesus was accused of things too. Did his refusal to "clear himself" prove that he was guilty?
426SSPX Resistance News / Re: Man arrested for email
« on: July 05, 2025, 04:02:46 PM »https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/belfast-telegraph/20250415/281556591665695
The above article may answer a number questions raised here on this forum with regards to the back ground of Mr. Kerry Michael Moran ('Fr. Fake' as Dr. Kavanagh calls him). Respectfully I address him as Mr. given that he was officially laicized as a deacon and as far I understand, can only be canonically reinstated to the clerical state with a special dispensation from the Holy See. This of course brings into question the validly of his alleged ordination, especially as he was laicised only last year (June 2024) and yet presented himself as an ordained pries less than a year later. Again, I use the word alleged, because it is shrouded in secrecy; no one knows who ordained him, when he was ordained, or whether he is simply claiming to be ordained. Perhaps, and I am speculating, this is what His Grace Archbishop Vigano was alluding to when he said himself and His Lordship Bishop Williamson had been deceived. What is certain is that this Mr. Moran has a long recorded history of being moved from place to place due to inappropriate behavior with minors. And as a Ladislaus outlined earlier, an innocent man, who cared about the faithful, would never insert himself into the homes of young children until he name about been formerly cleared.