Your decision is your business but applauding the subversive actions of this sede-vacantist choir is abhorrent. 

I love how anyone who disagrees with the new-sspx is a "sede" and a subversive.

Yet +ABL did the same thing against new-rome and Boru has no problem with +ABL.  

  If Boru's hypocrisy could make a sound, we'd all be deaf.

Several bishops denounced Newman to Rome as a heretic, and the very orthodox Cardinal Manninger certainly considered him to be one.

St. Pius X, unfortunately, made the mistake of backing Newman ... undoubtedly due to his advisors, since he obviously did not have the time to read the torrent of writing from Newman.

Newman had been very much opposed to Vatican I, and told those who opposed it after the Council to lay low because some day the "interpretation" of Vatican I, of papal infallibility, would change.  He clearly had a Modernist view regarding the "development of doctrine" (despite people who tried to claim otherwise), and Newman actually was the one who allowed the Modernists to get that initial foothold into the Church.

Don’t give up.    Try to change diet and if you can exercise.   We pray to God to heal you.  

Have a little self-respect, man ...

But it is precisely because they protest that we don't get doubtful priests at our chapel.

Correct, and this is the point of the protest.  If SSPX are hurt enough in their pocket books, only then will they back down and possibly do the right thing.  What they are doing here with the positively doubtful priests cannot be excused of objectively grave sin.  Period.

There's nowhere near any sufficient reason for not conferring Holy Orders conditionally, given the potentially grave harm that could be done to souls, and since the conditional form prevents sacrilege ... despite their gaslighting and deliberate / mendacious conflation of that concern where it does not apply.

They also promote the Modernist heresy of Father Paul Robinson.

Finally, they condoned taking of the COVID jab, and who knows how much blood they have on their hands.  I know of a fair number of Trad Catholics who took the jab because "SSPX said it was OK" ... and a couple of them died at a young age of "turbo cancer" shortly after taking the jab.  One woman attended a baby shower, then shortly thereafter felt sick, with a cough, and 3 weeks later was dead of cancer and metastasized and spread around in record time.

That's to say nothing of the moral compromise of telling people it's OK to participate in the crime of abortion by their false assertion that taking jab was only "remote material" cooperation in evil.

It's sad when +Vigano and even Schneider were to the right of them on this issue, as were Ripperger and many FSSP.

SSPX overall are worse than FSSP anymore.

Now, obviously, there are still many good priests among them.  Then, there's another tier where they think correctly themselves but just go along with the current thing.  In reality, they're simply cannot bring themselves to defy the SSPX since they're afraid of being tossed out into the streets, as it were ... and so the rationalize to themselves that it's justified under "obedience" (using the Nuremberg defense, as it were ... and the same false obedience they denounce in rejecting Vatican II and the New Mass).  Then there are those who are gung-ho pro Novus-Ordite, and then finally there are malicious infiltrators, intent upon destroying the SSPX.