« Last post by Maria Regina on Yesterday at 09:52:22 PM »
Could Soros be behind this?
In 2011, it was estimated that the illicit ‘organ trade’ generated illegal profits between USD 600 million and USD 1.2 billion per year. Underground ‘organ markets’ present a significant threat to the security of national organ donation systems, eroding the image of transplantation and public confidence in organ transplantation worldwide.
… Trafficking in Persons Protocol states that if the victim is a child, that is a person below the age of 18, consent is irrelevant regardless of whether any improper means (such as deception, force, abuse of a position of vulnerability) have been used. That means, trafficking in children for organ removal only requires that there is an act (recruitment, transport, transfer, harbouring or receipt of a child) for the purpose of exploitation through organ removal.
Kotzias, for decades, was a member of the “international left” and an active globalist. He is considered by many “an insider”. Now he has taken the mask off of the supposedly humanitarian face of Greek and European hospitality to immigrants and refugees. Under the “humanitarian” face and the open-border policies there is the face of profit from people-smuggling. Part of the migration effort, evidently, is all about money, not about helping foreigners in need.
In red we see the term movement is QUALIFIED.I don't think it's binding to begin with.
'The heretic was denying an unambiguously defined doctrine of the Church (after it was defined), yet you brought him in as if he was an authority on that very doctrine' you said.Rev. Roberts book was published in 1885, after papal infallibility was defined. The intro to the version linked above says he denied infallibility.
Now Stanley, will you show us all the defined doctrine you are referring to?
Matthew: That is a matter of opinion.Glad the forum's owner responded. PV was out of line, but better that M say it than I.
You (PV) are not the Pope. Please stop pretending to rule on practical, prudential matters. You have no authority to issue Papal proclamations, or issue encyclicals to settle and clarify disputed matters.
The evil of the mother is obvious, so I needn't point it out.'Gender dysphoria' in most cases seems to be evidence of parental abuse, parents who channel their political lunancy through their child. Some child might genuinely have identity issues, something to be pitied in this mad world, but the tendency to confirm them in their sickness is wholly depraved.
However, here is the important takeaway: Note the therapist blindly throws out any evidence against the child being transgender, and gave a REALLY stupid diagnosis in this case.
I'm inclined to think that many more diagnoses of "Gender Dysphoria" are also fake. I can't trust "the professionals" after learning the details of this case. There is an obvious agenda at work.