1
Crisis in the Church / The Spirit of Tradition vs The Spirit of Vatican II
« Last post by Fiorenza on Today at 03:11:18 AM »What would you define the Traditional Spirit as?
By comparing it with Vatican II, we can perhaps make some observations
* The Spirit of Vatican II is very feminine
* The Spirit of Vatican II is doubtful
* The Spirit of Vatican II has foreign elements, such as mandatory ecuмenism
* The Spirit of Vatican II apologizes for Catholic action in the past that it did not once apologize for
* The Spirit of Vatican II seems to be imitating another religion that is not Catholic
* The Spirit of Vatican II protestantizes
* The Spirit of Vatican II if left to its own devices would appear to terminate in irreligion
* The Spirit of Vatican II means clergy are constantly in defensive crouch
* The Spirit of Vatican II has created a Church government where the Papal Office is manipulated by non-Catholic powers (normally outside the walls, now within it seems)
* The Spirit of Vatican II needs constant alignment or correction otherwise it seems to automatically veer into heresy
* The Traditional Spirit is masculine
* The Traditional Spirit is more certain
* The Traditional Spirit does not seek to compromise, but instead to convert
* The Traditional Spirit defines itself in contrast to heresy
* The Traditional Spirit increases religion
* The Traditional Spirit in the clergy is a true missionary spirit
* The Traditional Spirit is still not yet powerful enough for government ?
* The Traditional Spirit unfortunately must deal with factionalism
It would be interesting to know what others' thoughts are...
By comparing it with Vatican II, we can perhaps make some observations
* The Spirit of Vatican II is very feminine
* The Spirit of Vatican II is doubtful
* The Spirit of Vatican II has foreign elements, such as mandatory ecuмenism
* The Spirit of Vatican II apologizes for Catholic action in the past that it did not once apologize for
* The Spirit of Vatican II seems to be imitating another religion that is not Catholic
* The Spirit of Vatican II protestantizes
* The Spirit of Vatican II if left to its own devices would appear to terminate in irreligion
* The Spirit of Vatican II means clergy are constantly in defensive crouch
* The Spirit of Vatican II has created a Church government where the Papal Office is manipulated by non-Catholic powers (normally outside the walls, now within it seems)
* The Spirit of Vatican II needs constant alignment or correction otherwise it seems to automatically veer into heresy
* The Traditional Spirit is masculine
* The Traditional Spirit is more certain
* The Traditional Spirit does not seek to compromise, but instead to convert
* The Traditional Spirit defines itself in contrast to heresy
* The Traditional Spirit increases religion
* The Traditional Spirit in the clergy is a true missionary spirit
* The Traditional Spirit is still not yet powerful enough for government ?
* The Traditional Spirit unfortunately must deal with factionalism
It would be interesting to know what others' thoughts are...