This kind of thing has been going on throughout the entire Protesphere for forever. Even the "traditional/conservative" Prot churches (i.e. Lutheran LCMS) are going with the "Church Growth" model, turning Church into little more then a growing corporation. All... Including Vatican 2... Have seem to have lost God as its focus.

Many Protestant congregations are essentially circles of family and friends who have known one another forever and who "go way back" in the community.  A Protestant typically doesn't remain Anglican, or Methodist, or Lutheran, or what have you, based upon deep theological conviction and militant defense of that denomination's tenets to the exclusion of other denominations, but because "they were raised that way", again, often a family thing.  So what you have now, is members of these families or social groups "coming out as gαy" (or whatever), and it becomes a case of "we love them so much that we have to find some way to accommodate them", trying not to split the congregation or the family, and maintaining social respectability and those all-important ties.  Your garden-variety (for instance) Lutheran can't even consider the truth of the claims of Catholicism, because that would mean, in a way, leaving their family and their upbringing.

You are right.  They have been pushing sodomy for years.  For years, lesbian hierarchy are gradually taking over Protestants. Women preaching is not biblical.  Methodist rely on man made laws instead of the Bible.   What is good that they didn’t count on the number of churches leaving.  They are now trying to stop “traditional” Methodists from leaving.   Sodomites are hateful and vindictive of course.  

Most of novus Ordo effeminate cardinals and bishops are practicing sodomites.  They are waiting for day they can come out with their husbands.  How many old sodomites have preyed on underage victims?  

That synod was hand picked sodomites and their buddies.  No mention of dealing with sex abuse scandals. No repenting or restitutions.  All about women and sodomy which means Jesus is rejected.  

.

This prophecy was fulfilled in January of 1938. It was not the aurora borealis, as pagans claim, since it appeared in the southern part of the sky. The aurora borealis is only seen towards the north in the northern hemisphere. Our Lady said it would be "an unknown light". The aurora borealis was definitely not an unknown light, but pagans won't admit anything miraculous, so that's how they explained it away.

And sure enough, it was not long after that miracle in 1938 that God punished the world for its crimes by means of war, etc.

Absolutely Correct Yeti. It was a sign gone lost in human history.

Canon Law is designed for the proper ordering of the Church in normal times.  In times of disarray, confusion, persecution, necessity, and turmoil, apart from those elements in Canon Law that are mere restatements of Divine Law or natural law, the rest are prudential calculations for keeping proper order in the Church during normal times, with all of them ultimately being ordered toward the salus animarum.  And, during normal times, that's exactly what those laws do.  In times of crisis, however, some of the human-law canonical provisions could in fact militate against the overaching principle of the salvation of souls.  In normal times, during the 1940s or 1950s, no priest could just decide to break off and set up his own chapel and his own "Society" of priests.  But during things like persecution under the Communists or the Arian crisis (where orthodox bishops went around consecrating Catholic bishops that had been usurped by Arians), or now the Conciliar Crisis, where 95% of the putative hierarchy and faithful demonstrably lack the Catholic faith (denying, by their own polls, one dogma or another), and yet have wrested control of the material offices from Catholics, all that goes out the window.  There's such a thing as material error as well, such as the famous case of St. Vincent Ferrer siding with an Antipope.  Did he thereby lose his "canonical mission"?  Of course not, since theologians explain that you can retain your jurisdiction (such as for him to hear Confessions) even via "color of title".  This is a Salza-esque reduction of the Church to legalisms (and human-law legalisms at that), to the point that those guys must conclude that Joe Biden is more Catholic than Archbishop Lefebvre.

Here's a solid example of where lower-level laws are ordered to the higher-level, and if the lower-level laws militate against the higher-level laws, not only are they no longer binding, but in fact they are prohibited by the higher-level law against which they militate.

Yes, good explanation. If LeDeg wants to know about lawful clergy, he might start by reading about law in St Thomas: "In time of necessity, there is no law" - S. Th. IaIIae Q96 A6. "Since then the lawgiver cannot have in view every single case, he shapes the law according to what happens most frequently... Wherefore, if a case arise wherein the observance of that law would be harmful to the common good, it should not be observed".