So, this Banez character doesn't care about "evidence".  He has a narrative, that Vatican II good (in light of Tradition) and if Conciliar Church says Newman is a saint and doctor, then that's what he is.

Banez, please explain your presence on this forum.

1) Are you even a Traditional Catholic?
2) If you identify as such, how do you define the term Traditional Catholic?
3) Where to you attend Mass most of the time?
4) Are you a Conciliar seminarian?
5) Have you been on this forum before under a similar username?

1. Yes
2. A Traditional Catholic is one who attends the TLM and is orthodox doctrinally
3. I attend an FSSP parish every Sunday
4. No
5. Yes, but I don't see why that matters

Pope St Pius X said the Catholic encyclopaedia was modernist trash. Newman was a modernist. There is plenty of evidence already posted in this thread.

So, this Banez character doesn't care about "evidence".  He has a narrative, that Vatican II good (in light of Tradition) and if Conciliar Church says Newman is a saint and doctor, then that's what he is.

Banez, please explain your presence on this forum.

1) Are you even a Traditional Catholic?
2) If you identify as such, how do you define the term Traditional Catholic?
3) Where to you attend Mass most of the time?
4) Are you a Conciliar seminarian?
5) Have you been on this forum before under a similar username?

Give me a serious theologian who says such a thing.

Seriously ... ?

https://endtimes.video/pope-pius-ii-destroys-muslims-christian-worship/
https://endtimes.video/muslims-christians-worship-st-vincent-ferrer/

As per the teachings of these popes and saints, etc. ... no, the Muslims and Jews do not worship the same God as Christians / Catholics.

Here's the logical sleight of hand.  So, the Muslims and Jews worship a God that shares SOME attributes with the Catholic and Christian God, but that does not make them the same in all attributes, and all the essential attributes.

Someone comes by and says, "Yes, I believe in dogs, these furry little animals."

Does he believe in dogs?  You'd say "Yes" and so does Vatican II.

But dos he actually?

Then he says, "These dogs are 10 feet fall and have serpentine necks that stretch longer than the rest of their bodies, etc."

NOW, does he believe in dogs?  No.  That which he calls a dog is not the reality of dog, but something else he saw or imagined, so no, in fact, he does not believe in a dog, not what a dog objectively is.

This dovetails with Vatican II subjectivism, where as long as you say or think you believe in something, then you do believe, since it'st he subjective intention that counts, whether or not it corresponds with objective reality.  This guy's experience of "dog" is just different than mine, and, who knows?, maybe he has a point there and knows some things I don't.  That's in fact the entirety of the Vatican II theological [sic] system in a nutshell, where subjective knowledge is true, true for you, whether or not it actually coincides with objective truth.

This guy is clearly a troll or a modernist heretic. Either way he is a poor soul, let's pray for his repentance.

I was just about to post the same thing. 

Do you know what Muslims believe about God?(his essence, his attributes, etc) Avicenna who was a prominent Muslim philosopher was extremely influential on St. Thomas.

If you want to know more about Islam, read primary source materials. Their view of the nature of God is very close to ours (with the exception of the difference over the Trinity)

God the Father has a Son, Jesus Christ. If Muslims do not accept Christ as the Son of God, they do not worship the same god as us.

By the way, are you still a heretic?


https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/excellent-video-from-david-bentley-hart-which-shows-not-all-ecuмenism-is-bad/msg969628/#msg969628

Hell does exist, and those who die having committed grave sins will spend time there. However, whether it is eternal or ultimately comes to an end is a serious question.