Nice joke, but NO it's not even a sin. Even though the world considers it ONE OF THE LAST SERIOUS SINS, they blaspheme Our Lord's holy Name left and right, but they don't even say "nigger" as part of a QUOTE.

That's how I am about blasphemy -- I won't use blasphemous phrases as quotes, lyrics, let alone from myself.
But God is my God!  Do people literally worship black people? What the heck?

Obviously it could be a sin of contumely (in-your-face expressions of hatred against a person), hatred, inciting someone to anger, etc. -- but as conservatives often remind you, "That's already against the law".

You don't need a special "sin" for saying "nigger". Unless saying the phrase involves some OTHER EXISTING law, it's not a sin.

Negro = black
It was used as a term for black man.
It doesn't take much imagination to see how "negro" became "nigger" in common slang.

Oh, and might I remind you -- they refer to THEMSELVES with this word, the same way we call someone "dude" or "man". Like 5 times per minute.
So it can't bother them too much.

As for "latent multi-generational PTSD" -- their great-great-great-great-grandfather was called "nigger" as a term of hatred and derision on the plantation, and now it bothers them when they hear it -- just "get out of here". Not even worthy of a response.
Modern day blacks have no memory of being a slave, not even if they talked to their 110 year old grandfather. You have to realize how long ago 1865 was...

Across all publicly available years, all the 501(c)(3) reported approximately $7,988,347 in total revenue and $2,601,332 in net income, unusually high figures for a loosely organized remnant traditional Catholic network.

You have demonstrated that you have no understanding of how to read financial statements. You don't encourage  "transparency and accountability" by combining assets (without liabilities) and revenue (without expenses) to arrive at misleading final number of nearly 8 million USD, as you have done.

You are just muddying the waters. You don't even know how an Asset differs from Revenue, you just add the two together and call it a day. You are financially clueless.

You imply that Bishop Zendejas currently has 8 million dollars at his disposal to spend as he wishes. In another thread, you suggested that someone contact Bishop Zendejas to pay for a Church in Africa. What exactly is your agenda?

You say Bishop Z's NY building was formerly a Jєωιѕн ѕуηαgσgυє? What does this have to do with his finances? Nothing. You are trying to blacken Bishop Z's name by throwing out innuendo.

Bishop Zendejas is not currently sitting on a huge pile of money. Most of his Assets are buildings, his chapels and related buildings. He cannot sell those buildings to generate cash to give to the African priest or whatever cause you think up. But you don't seem to understand that. Or you are just here trying to stir up trouble. Which is it?

You have made several claims about my knowledge and intentions, but none of that changes the basic point. The figures I referenced come directly from the IRS Form 990 filings for Sapientia Association, Inc. and Sapientia Education Association, Inc. on ProPublica. Those filings show that in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021 Sapientia Association reported 1,287,603 dollars in revenue, and in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021 Sapientia Education reported 953,957 dollars in revenue. Those numbers are not my interpretation. They are taken directly from the organizations own IRS submissions.

You have said that I implied someone is sitting on eight million dollars. That is not accurate. I quoted the revenue and net income figures that the organizations themselves reported to the IRS. Nothing more. Nothing less.

You also said the ѕуηαgσgυє history is irrelevant. It was mentioned only because the property appears in public records under Sapientia. That is a matter of public record as well. There was no innuendo attached to it.

If you believe the filings are misleading or paint an incomplete picture, that is a separate discussion. The filings are public and they show what they show. Any reasonable person reviewing sudden revenue spikes of that size would ask where the money came from and how it was allocated. That is not an accusation. That is a normal question based on publicly reported information.

Nothing I have said goes beyond what the organizations themselves submitted to the IRS. If transparency and accountability are good things, then pointing to publicly filed financial data should not be a problem.

The publicly available IRS filings for Sapientia Association, Inc. and Sapientia Education Association, Inc. that you provided on ProPublica show substantial revenue that merits attention for transparency and accountability

#1-Sapientia Association, Inc. (EIN 81-2106002) reported $1,287,603 in total revenue for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021, with expenses of $105,758, resulting in a net income of $1,181,845. Previous years show far lower revenue levels. Source: Form 990 FY2021 – ProPublica

#2-Sapientia Education Association, Inc. (EIN 47-3913734) reported $953,957 in revenue for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, with expenses of $190,799, resulting in a net income of $763,158. Source: Form 990 FY2021 – ProPublica

#3-Public records show that Sapientia Association, Inc. is listed as the owner of 111 Smith Ridge Road, South Salem, NY, a property sold in 2016 for approximately $1,375,000. The building previously served as a Jєωιѕн ѕуηαgσgυє and is now associated with activities linked to the organizations above. County and planning records confirm this ownership. Sources: Westchester County Parcel Viewer, Zillow, local archives

#4-These filings and property records are public and reflect the organizations’ reported revenue, net income, and property holdings. Donor names are generally redacted in publicly posted Form 990s

#5-Given the significant revenue and the concentration of property holdings, it is reasonable for observers and contributors to seek transparency on funding sources and the allocation of resources. This information is presented strictly from publicly available filings and county records

You have demonstrated that you have no understanding of how to read financial statements. You don't encourage  "transparency and accountability" by combining assets (without liabilities) and revenue (without expenses) to arrive at misleading final number of nearly 8 million USD, as you have done.

You are just muddying the waters. You don't even know how an Asset differs from Revenue, you just add the two together and call it a day. You are financially clueless.

You imply that Bishop Zendejas currently has 8 million dollars at his disposal to spend as he wishes. In another thread, you suggested that someone contact Bishop Zendejas to pay for a Church in Africa. What exactly is your agenda? 

You say Bishop Z's NY building was formerly a Jєωιѕн ѕуηαgσgυє? What does this have to do with his finances? Nothing. You are trying to blacken Bishop Z's name by throwing out innuendo.

Bishop Zendejas is not currently sitting on a huge pile of money. Most of his Assets are buildings, his chapels and related buildings. He cannot sell those buildings to generate cash to give to the African priest or whatever cause you think up. But you don't seem to understand that. Or you are just here trying to stir up trouble. Which is it?

Interesting theological question. Depends. Was your friend black or white? Do you have the pass from someone who is black? So many nuances to this question. Hopefully Leo XIV writes an encyclical clearing this one up.