CathInfo.com

To describe the ball of the Child of Prague as a sphere of creation, a symbol of a flat-earth, just about illustrates the lengths the flatearthers will go to have their way. Add to that the dome of the earth Our Lady was standing on was really a flat-earth is another bit of theological nonsense.

As you should know well, only if ALL the Fathers agree on an interpretation of Scripture can it NOT be challenged. The Galileo case, which your referenced site uses as a theological argument for flat-earthism, I reject absolutely. Not once was a flat earth brought up by either the philosophers or theologians in the Galileo affair. All presumed that the earth is a globe at the time, and Pythagorism was only in the context of a moving sun and the earth immobile at the centre of the universe.

So what if many of the Fathers held to a flat earth, this confirms nothing but that they were wrong.

Many Church Fathers and scripture take a lot of time describing creation explaining the heavens are vaulted and hell is a pit, that there are no antipodes, people living opposite of each other; and that Jerusalem is at the center of the world.  Beyond that, no one is certain exactly the shape of the world. That up is up, is beyond question in the flat earth model.  That up is up on a ball is a contradiction.  Up is above, not "out there" or "down there" as it would have to be on a ball.  Above on a ball is sometimes up, sometimes down, depending on where you are. Such an excellent foundation for relativity and relativism employed so easily these days one has to wonder how such deception has taken foothold in society, unless of course, the very world they believe in supports it.  Catholic teachings are incompatible with a globe.  The firmament is incompatible with a globe.  There is no such thing as space. Rockets never went outside the firmament.  How can oxygen starved engines operate in so-called space?  How does a vacuum exist without being contained?  
How did Christ rise on a globe?   Which way did Christ rise that doesn't contradict itself? Which way is up on a globe? Science that even a child can understand proves beyond any reasonable doubt that water cannot stick to a ball, let alone curve across its surface when at rest.  Ships do not disappear behind a curve when they sail out to sea, the number one proof round earthers once used but was handily destroyed with greater access to cameras and telescopes.   Planes do not adjust for a curve as they fly, but fly level using instruments that are incapable of adjusting for arc because they work exclusively by keeping the plane level.  Lighthouses, astrolabes, bubble levels and literally dozens of instruments can only work on a flat surface.
The only reason flat earth was not brought up by the geocentrists in the Galileo case is because flat earth comes prepackaged with geocentrism and has always been included.  The discussion in the Galileo Affair was about which model was true.  There are only two systems, heliocentric and geocentric, and the Church condemned heliocentrism.  Cosmas used scripture in literally dozens of ways proving earth is not a sphere.  How odd that the contention today happens to be with globalist pagans using the heliocentric model to enslave the masses with their lies, flinging human beings through space on a ball.  Smh.  The pagan mouthpiece of heliocentrism, NASA, has been caught with their hand in the cgi cookie jar by faking moon landings, painting globes, rendering cgi planets and suspending people in the air via green screens in the fake ssi while stealing billions, but lets believe them anyway!  The entire modern science world is as dirty and convoluted as apostate bishops of the Catholic Church, full of lies and half truths that lead people to believe in a pagan model of their world recreated in Satan's image that makes it possible for the antiChrist to take his seat.

Both scripture and prophecy have warned us that there are false sciences, so there is no question that this subject matters. I wonder which one is false? Heliocentrism or geocentrism?  Round earth or flat earth?
St. Nilus: ...the impious one!...will so complete science with vanity that it will go off the right path and lead people to lose faith in the existence of God in three hypostases.

With the crisis in the Church and the great apostasy proving that we are in the evil times spoken of by St. Nilus, and with the world accepting heliocentrism, literally pounding it down our throats, it is fair to say we know who's lying.  Mankind wholesale purchased false science warned about in scripture because they abandoned God's Word and His Church: 1 Timothy 6:20 20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called.
Your theory rests on a literal hatred for flat earth and the notion that pagan science has to be truthful on one issue: that earth is a globe.  Ha. Good luck with that.  Everything you believe about globe earth is based in the hopes that the Fathers of the Church were wrong, prophecy is wrong, simple understanding is wrong, math is wrong, empirical science is wrong, history is wrong, and that modern pagan scientists who long held heliocentrism are somehow right because they and their pagan predecessors couldn't possibly tell a lie.  Unhappy hope.  

That perspective argument always makes me laugh. It requires light to curve at sharp angles and an arbitrary distance away from the viewer, and to turn at a different place if the viewer walks forward or backwards. It also turns at a different distance depending on who is seeing it. Pretty impressive stuff to be honest.

Many Church Fathers and scripture take a lot of time describing creation explaining the heavens are vaulted and hell is a pit, that there are no antipodes, people living opposite of each other; and that Jerusalem is at the center of the world.  Beyond that, no one is certain exactly the shape of the world. That up is up, is beyond question in the flat earth model.  That up is up on a ball is a contradiction.  Up is above, not "out there" or "down there" as it would have to be on a ball.  Above on a ball is sometimes up, sometimes down, depending on where you are. Such an excellent foundation for relativity and relativism employed so easily these days one has to wonder how such deception has taken foothold in society, unless of course, the very world they believe in supports it.  Catholic teachings are incompatible with a globe.  The firmament is incompatible with a globe.  There is no such thing as space. Rockets never went outside the firmament.  How can oxygen starved engines operate in so-called space?  How does a vacuum exist without being contained?  
How did Christ rise on a globe?   Which way did Christ rise that doesn't contradict itself? Which way is up on a globe? Science that even a child can understand proves beyond any reasonable doubt that water cannot stick to a ball, let alone curve across its surface when at rest.  

What's Up you ask Happenby. Well Solange Hertz told us here:

http://www.ldolphin.org/geocentricity/Hertz.pdf 

What's up is as relevant to the global earth as a flat earth. Take the global moon and planets for example. Why don't rocks or dust fall off the underside of it? The answer of course is GRAVITY.

Understanding Gravity: From the Latin gravitás, meaning heavy.


It is gravity that allows all on global earth to have the earth under us and the sky above. Christ rose up into the sky into heaven as witnessed by some of the Apostles. That is why all things stay fixed to earth all around the globe. So, all up is heaven, and all down is Hell, the furthest place from heaven.