So, “Are the French Priests listening”. No, except for Fathers Faure (worth 1,000,000 of them, naturally), Rioult, Salenave, Pivert, etc. “Why? They should know better!” Because 1) of ABL’s angelism (explained in two ECs), and 2) “nadie es profeta en su tierra” (Our Lord, Monseñor Lefebvre, Monseñor Williamson, Father Faure, Father Trincado, and the other Resistants ones). So, what can be done? May be Matto (and others like him) is the answer for this precise second.
Now, such as I see it (ignorant), the sedevacantism does not get along with the latin world. Bad Popes since juan el bueno (and throughout the convulsive history of the Church): yes. No Popes: no. It is something in our blood, may be, and might explain the popularity of +W (non-sedevacantist from reading/listening to his words) in Brazil and Mexico. After the inminent (in my opinion) chastiment, the humble (to say the least) Church will study the subject (as has always done) and will pronounce.
Example: at the first visit of Monseñor Lefebvre to Argentina (197.?) many trads ran away from him -my father included, although later clarified- because of a bad translation from latin into spanish by Octavio Sequeiros (our good friend; now deceased), of a dispute in latin between Monseñor Lefebvre (non-sedevacantist) and Carlos Disandro (sedevacantist), making Monseñor Lefebvre appear as sedevacantist.
Nevertheless: I am going to try to "make friends" :sign-surrender: with sedevacantists, at this second. Can’t tell you the next second.