Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Letter from Fr. Pinaud  (Read 14185 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2013, 11:14:34 PM »
June 24        Feast of St. John the Baptist
Is there any news of the outcome of the "trial"?
 :judge:

Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #11 on: June 25, 2013, 01:13:14 AM »
.


Quote from: the OP

On the same day, March 6, Bishop Williamson received from the same address [nicolas_pinaud@yahoo.fr] the following message that I neither wrote nor sent:

“Dear Bishop, it would seem that the address of Fr. Rioult (1) has been hacked. If you have any docuмents to forward to him, send them to me and I will forward them to him. (In particular any  work in progress). Courage. We will have them. Wishing you a holy Lent, I assure you of my prayers, dear Bishop. N. Pinaud”

Bishop Williamson was deceived by the false message, and sent a response to me that I have never received, and for good reason! It was a bailiff who communicated this to me several weeks ago. . . I do not know how many people were deceived by this urbi et orbi diffusion, which, to say the least, lacks justice? If you are one of them, let me know. Watch this space. [lasapiniere.info]




This would be at least the second time +W has been snookered by
the kikes who pull the strings of His Eagerness B. Fellay.

They know his weaknesses too well.  And they have no scruples in
using them to every advantage against him and the Resistance.  

There are really evil people out there who will stop at nothing.


And then there are the waughs of the world who insist that everything
is just fine.  Go back to sleep.   :sleep:





Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #12 on: June 25, 2013, 05:18:29 AM »
Is there nothing one can do with regard to this unheard of detention, outside Communist systems. How can anyone justify over 90 days detention, awaiting some kind of 'trial' for a priest who simply did not agree with the neo-Sup Gen's approaches to Rome???

Is there not some kind of regulation within the SSPX itself on dealing with priests who may voice their disagreement with something, without being subjected to an 'arrest' and 'detention' without any appeal, even while the arrogant powers that be decide how they are going to deal with the matter???

Why is there no outcry from fellow priests around the world against this enforced and lengthy detention??? Why the silence? Except from the few from the Resistance...

Something is very, very wrong with the whole system within the neo-SSPX.

Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #13 on: June 25, 2013, 05:46:17 AM »
1917, excellent posts here in cathinfo a few months ago re. "crimestop", "crime-think", "thoughtcrime" (1984 novel, George Orwell) applied to the current crisis in the ExSPX. Also, this link (surely exists in English as well), might help understand "methodology" which might have been applied since Monseñor Lefebvre passed away (Palo Alto is in Silicon Valley):

es.wikipedia.org / wiki / Escuela_de_Palo_Alto

Letter from Fr. Pinaud
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2013, 05:56:33 AM »
Zeitun, what bothers me is that these good priests don't have a mother, father, any family member, any friend, explaining to them that they need to run away. It is so obvious. I am doing my best with the ones I know or with their friends (who think likewise) to convince them. But it would seem no success.