Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Catholic dogma on salvation  (Read 17628 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Catholic dogma on salvation
« Reply #160 on: June 12, 2018, 08:43:13 AM »
The SSPX DOES NOT have an official position on this. I recently spoke to a SSPX seminary professor/priest who hold the same view as I.
Sorry, but your statement is false Banezian.

The SSPX has and does propagandize a false Catholic theology to fit their political needs.

In +ABL's book below, the SSPX preaches a false doctrine of implicit Baptism.
Baptism of Desire and Baptism of Blood were not good enough for them. They needed a magical baptism.

This heresy was promoted by +ABL's contemporary, Karl Rahner, the notoriously nutty Jesuit.
He was a heretic even by Conciliar church standards.

How did this happen?

You see, Implicit Baptism suits Menzingen's political purposes to be dogmatically "flexible" for a future newChurch deal.



On page 74 of this book, it reads:

"The doctrine of the Church also recognizes implicit baptism of desire. This consists in doing the will of God. God knows all men and He knows amongst Protestants, Muslim, Buddhists and in the whole of humanity there are men of good will. They receive the grace of baptism without knowing it, but in an effective way. In this they become part of the Church".

This incredible, тαℓмυdic inspired lie, has never been refuted by anyone in the SSPX.

In fact, Bp. Fellay extrapolated on this magical baptism in San Francisco (Jan 2016).
From the sanctuary, he preached to the SSPX faithful that aborted babies went to Heaven via Baptism of Blood. 

The rabbis must be laughing their asses off at this one?  

"Yes, let's murder more unbaptized babies so the dumb goy can pretend they went to Heaven".

Ask your SSPX seminary priest/professor to explain this?  He can't and he won't.

Tell him you have written proof, by his own leaders, that the SSPX is without traditional "rigidity" for Catholic dogmas.

It is very clear that Menzingen modifies Catholic dogmas as they go along, to bend with newChurch politics.

This explains why the SSPX has gone bonkers...



They're trying to make themselves presentable to the "Destroyer" pope.

Suggest that you read more and weep, watch and pray Banezian.

Re: Catholic dogma on salvation
« Reply #161 on: June 12, 2018, 09:19:47 AM »
There are a lot of "forgiveness" and "mercy" sermons coming out these days, as well.  And I don't mean just Novus Ordo sources, either.  Rome is trying a new tactic of softening Tradition via easy contacts and blessings from them (local bishop gives marriage permission; traditional Corpus Christi processions allowed to come into a local parish as a stop along the route, AND PUT OUR LORD ON A NOVUS ORDO TABLE!!!); also getting "Trad" priests to betray by sermonizing along the New Church "God is Love" lines.  These priests and these trad people, both young and old, are tired of the fight or never understood it to begin with.  The New Church, the Modernist Church, has been condemned by Pius X.  It should not even exist.  True Catholics are not satisfied with being thrown a bone of just having a "lane," a traditional Latin "rite" amongst all the others that allows sentimentalists to attend a Latin Mass just because they like it better.  The Novus Ordo must be put to death - a stake through its heart!  When the Triumph of Our Lady's Immaculate Heart takes place, it will no longer exist.  Please, Blessed Mother, hasten that day!      


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Catholic dogma on salvation
« Reply #162 on: June 12, 2018, 09:34:46 AM »
Sure. I don't bother to be precise because I've already put several hours into this silly discussion.

Then, by all means, just drop off.  You'd get a lot less antagonism from us "Feeneyites" if you were to use language which doesn't undermine Catholic dogma.

Or, like the CMRI, who published the scandalous article "The Salvation of those Outside the Church" ... a word-for-word contradiction of Catholic dogma.

Re: Catholic dogma on salvation
« Reply #163 on: June 12, 2018, 09:37:03 AM »
I almost regret joining Cathinfo. Many dull folks with Protestant mindsets who think they know better than the Church
You need, Father, to catch up.  The finger of God is with Fr. Feeney.  If you know your Church history, you have noticed how God raises up souls, often saints, to fix or judge on things incorrect or doctrines being softened or ignored.  Such is the fight against the necessity of the Church membership for salvation, and the necessity of Baptism of Water. Ecuмenism was a huge and well prepared-for element at the Vatican II Council.  Fr. Feeney was most inconvenient to these plans.  His superiors said that he was the best theologian they had in America by far. This was not a lightweight priest.  And now, in retrospect, we see that his concerns were well founded.  If you pray for truth, the Holy Ghost will show you this as well.  His cause was railroaded, much the same as Arch. L., who said he has never had a fair hearing.  Neither did Fr. Feeney.  When the powers that be don't want your case, when they are against God and you, they will stonewall you, and call you names.  But the heroes hold their position.   

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Catholic dogma on salvation
« Reply #164 on: June 12, 2018, 09:43:02 AM »
Really? Try using a chocolate chip cookie for transubstantiation. Silly statement that God is not bound by His sacraments.

God is indeed not bound by His Sacraments ... and yet God has seen fit to bind US.  But, yes, it's a silly statement but it RINGS true, and so they use it (even though it doesn't apply).