Intersting thing is that it gets 30% "fresh" on Rotten Tomatoes ... from the critics, but 97% from audiences.
This invariably means that there's something not "politically correct" about the movie or isn't touchy-feely enough, etc.
So I read summaries of the the first 5 negative reviews from critics and ... BINGO. Here are 4 of the 5:
The film's heavy-handed and bogus message tells us that Hollywood is immoral because it acts to corrupt its viewer's minds.
...
The only thing not covered in this Christo-fascist manifesto of a movie is “guns.”
...
While there are moments of intensity in Nefarious, there isn't a moment in the film that feels like cinematic horror unless you're talking about one of those evangelical haunted houses where demons pop out of the walls to warn of the evils of the world.
...
Nefarious builds to a howler of a climax that delivers exactly what you’d anticipate from the makers of God’s Not Dead, just in an even more preposterous way. The big scene would be perfect for an Airplane!-style spoof of evangelical-themed films.
Nearly all movie critics are flaming Leftist anti-religious hedonistic dirtbags.
If a move has a PC theme, promoting sodomy or anything immotal, it'll get rave reviews from these scuм critics. But dare a movie touch upon anything non-PC, their objective and unbiased "reviews" try to shred the movie.
I use Rotten Tomatoes as an anti-review. If I find a much higher audience score than the critics score, it's usually a safe bet that it's a good movie.