I know some of you like to see these (including me on occasion) and I don't think this one has been linked or discussed here.  Here's a link to a FE Debate between these two.

By the way, about Witsit himself --

I recommend his videos on Flat Earth. He's very smart for his age (about 32). He clearly has a high IQ and has done a lot of research. Furthermore, he has a skill at debating and he's willing to bring public attention to Flat Earth. That doesn't mean he's perfect however.

He fell for the "Jesuits/Catholic Church is the bad guy" BS.  Long story short, much of what WE would ascribe to the Jews, the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, he would ascribe to "Jesuits" and "the Catholic Church". He has some vague belief in a Creator, but he's not even a straight up Christian (protestant). He thinks there's something to Scripture, but he doesn't believe "what most Christians believe" about Jesus.

And although he understands a lot of the high-end topics better than me, I would have him beat on things like history, religion, Latin, English language (etymology, pronouncing "big words", etc.) So as I listen to his podcasts, I vacillate between "wow, he's got me beat" and "man, I need to help him out!" A final criticism is that he's a bit of a wigger. He likes hip hop and is able to freestyle rap (which is an impressive skill, but not my cup of tea). He's also a product of one of the younger generations, and he identifies as very "cool" so he uses all the modern slang. But most of these criticisms would apply to all men his age.

That having been said, he's put out a lot of good videos on the specific topic of flat earth. He's not a worse choice than David Weiss or Eric Dubay. None of the major FE Youtube personalities got religion correct. Finding the true religion seems to be a real stumblingblock for "freethinking truthers" it would seem. Maybe there's just a lot of anti-Catholic propaganda in the Truth community (internet), so most truthers suck up the poison at some point...

I haven't watched / listend to this yet, but Whitsit is capable of countering Dave's "debating" style, which consists of rapid-fire gratuitous (unproven) assertions which he then assumes to be true unless they're refuted, but becuase he throws so many out there, his opponent doesn't have time to carefully refute them all, with Dave then declaring victory for having thrown more points out there.  It's basically the "throw manure at the wall" style.  Whitsit has the talent to take that on, so I've long been curious to see how these two would match up.  David Weiss couldn't withstand Dave's (dishonest) debating style and wasn't expecting it.  If he had anticipated it, the best approach is to simply call it out and gratuitously reject his gratuitous assertions.  This is what College and High School debate started to turn into during my years there in the late 1980s (and it's only gotten worse), and that's why I quite two years into college.

Just a few minutes in, and after the opening statements that was a sloppy mess.  Moderator completely lost control, where Dave in particular wouldn't let Austin complete a sentence before talking over him. 

I watched 45 minutes last night and am going to try to finish tonight but I was hoping for a more formal debate where each side has equal time to make points and counterpoints without talking over each other.  Of course Dave starts in on the insults and condescending attitude right from the get go and Austin kept it cool for the most part but did fire a few shots after Dave wanted to go to the dirt.  I liked how Austin called out how Dave is pushed on YT and the censorship they do.  I never knew about the coffee cup light thing that was presented.  I thought that was kind of neat. 

Hoping it gets more under control and the moderator makes it a little more formal after I resume about the 45minute mark but I'm not going to hold my breath.  I'll review more after I finish watching this.