Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX are truly the enemy  (Read 1748 times)

1 Member and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX are truly the enemy
« Reply #25 on: August 17, 2026, 10:49:04 PM »
If we all stop responding to Mr. Cabbage
He will probably just vanish 

If only it were that simple.  He regularly strarts threads ... and often derails thread by constantly making everything about his favorite subject(s), namely, spewing contempt at Archbishop Thuc, "dogmatic sedevacantists" (even though I know few sedevacantists more dogmatic than he is), and the (neo-)SSPX.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX are truly the enemy
« Reply #26 on: August 17, 2026, 11:14:30 PM »
Like I said above, the Ortho Schismatics have the Mass too.

So, implying that SSPX, sedevacantist, etc. are in the same category as the Orthodox indicates that you're slouching hard toward being schismatic yourself.


Re: SSPX are truly the enemy
« Reply #27 on: August 17, 2026, 11:23:33 PM »
SSPX are not the enemy. They are for the most part good Catholics. However, they should sign a canonical agreement with Rome, just like Archbishop Lefebvre himself did on May 5, 1988, and remained open to doing even after that. However, they have the right to ask, on behalf of the Universal Church, for greater freedoms for all priests to offer the TLM. Bishop Fellay rightly said: "I rejoice whenever a TLM is celebrated", though some here call that "tradcuмenism". As an Indult Catholic myself, my sentiments are similar to that of Bishop Fellay on this issue. 

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX are truly the enemy
« Reply #28 on: August 18, 2026, 12:35:39 AM »
SSPX are not the enemy. They are for the most part good Catholics. However, they should sign a canonical agreement with Rome, just like Archbishop Lefebvre himself did on May 5, 1988, and remained open to doing even after that. However, they have the right to ask, on behalf of the Universal Church, for greater freedoms for all priests to offer the TLM. Bishop Fellay rightly said: "I rejoice whenever a TLM is celebrated", though some here call that "tradcuмenism". As an Indult Catholic myself, my sentiments are similar to that of Bishop Fellay on this issue.

We've got another Motarian / Indultarian / Conciliar troll who promotes Pelagian heresy and doesn't believe the dogma that there's no salvation outside the Church.  Is this another Nishant account?

Re: SSPX are truly the enemy
« Reply #29 on: August 18, 2026, 02:12:14 AM »
We've got another Motarian / Indultarian / Conciliar troll who promotes Pelagian heresy and doesn't believe the dogma that there's no salvation outside the Church.  Is this another Nishant account?
Who is "Nishant"? You're always obsessed with accusing those who disagree with you of being someone you don't like. Truth is truth no matter where it comes from. Yes, I am an Indult Traditionalist, and per the rules of the Forum, and its stated purpose, I am allowed to post the Indult perspective here. You know you can't logically refute the Indult Catholic perspective from Church teaching, so you dishonestly try to get Indult Trads banned from making their case. That's dishonest. If your conscience were really open to the truth, you would be open to hearing the other side.