CathInfo.com

Sadly, you are spreading lies about a legitimate Pope, Benedict XVI, who was made to appear to be a heretic by his enemies.

What?  He did that all by himself and well before he traded in his V2-era suit-and-tie for a white cassock.

When I read your words above, it made me think of those who endlessly excuse and defend Trumpenstein's clearly problematic words and actions.  He is not being thwarted or made to look bad by those around him; he is doing the job he has been assigned and doing it really well while far too many remain utterly oblivious to the reality of the situation.

I am so sick of the filthy liars who infest the Trad movement, constantly lying and slandering, twisting truth and reality ... just to get the outcome they have a prior emotional attachment to, like that scuмbucket there who keeps lying about the case of Honorius to "prove" the opinon among the "5 Opinions" that was held by the fewest actual theologians, that a Pope can never lose his office, even if he's a heretic ... other than by death or resignation, the same lie that pseudo-Bishop Schneider was selling.  After citing the fact that theologians are divided regarding the Honorius case, but all say that he was not actually a heretic who adhered to monotheletism, and quoting Pope Leo II, who differentiated between the actual heretics and Honorius, who PERMITTED them to sully dogma.

But they completely ignore the actual facts and evidence ... and then proceed to reiterate their lies as if they had not seen what was just posted that refutes their errors.  They are not interested in truth, but only in promoting some agenda.

Recall that this Angelus moron was the same one who kept insisting over and over again that Bergoglio's election was invalid because Wojtyla's UDG docuмent said that the conclave should begin after the funeral rites of the Pope, and since Ratzinger didn't have a funeral, this invalidated the election of Bergoglio ... despite citations from the docuмent where it talks about resignation, and mention of how the Latin grammar has the verb in the subjunctive, clearly indicating that it's referring to "funeral rites IF ANY", i.e. in the case of death, and not to some absolute requirement that there be a funeral rite.  That would lead to the absurdity that after a resignation of the Pope, the See would then remain vacant until the Pope actually died.