Manuel, you can't make generic "poison the well" statements. If there's something inaccurate, please address it specifically.
The original post has been modified and updated, and several response posts have been deleted.
I needed to make it clear that biases and incomplete information can distort the truth of any situation, and that it is best to seek verification of any presented information.
Pablo was accused of animal sacrifices, for one, in at least a few posts on this site. That is mainly inaccurate. While a dog was burned, it was not a sacrifice, nor was Pablo involved in that decision.
I did not seek to poison the well, but just to caution against forming a judgement against the seminary or Pablo based solely on the writing in this thread.
Take my post like the food warning labels. The food may be fine, but it is always best to take care.
This thread may contain trace amounts of Peanuts...