Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Pablo - Paul Hernandez - the Crisis in Kentucky  (Read 39434 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Pablo - Paul Hernandez - the Crisis in Kentucky
« Reply #65 on: March 31, 2016, 02:07:10 PM »
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: ManuelChavez
I am curious as to why this is being bumped? Is there more to add to what has already been said previously?


Someone contacted me and wanted this information about Pablo. I figured once I found it, I should bump it in case anyone else is looking for it.


 pieces of this thread are not true. Caution is advised when reading the thread.



You mean like when you accused Matthew of slander for claiming that Pablo says to practice Omerta and then he threw the link at you silencing you? You that part was pretty untrue that you wrote. Got it...

Pablo - Paul Hernandez - the Crisis in Kentucky
« Reply #66 on: March 31, 2016, 03:03:31 PM »
Quote from: Centroamerica
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: ManuelChavez
I am curious as to why this is being bumped? Is there more to add to what has already been said previously?


Someone contacted me and wanted this information about Pablo. I figured once I found it, I should bump it in case anyone else is looking for it.


 pieces of this thread are not true. Caution is advised when reading the thread.



You mean like when you accused Matthew of slander for claiming that Pablo says to practice Omerta and then he threw the link at you silencing you? You that part was pretty untrue that you wrote. Got it...


Libel, not slander. Slander is spoken, libel is written. People make mistakes. I don't recall accusing Matthew of libel, though, on this one issue.


Pablo - Paul Hernandez - the Crisis in Kentucky
« Reply #67 on: March 31, 2016, 03:10:54 PM »
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: Centroamerica
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: Matthew
Quote from: ManuelChavez
I am curious as to why this is being bumped? Is there more to add to what has already been said previously?


Someone contacted me and wanted this information about Pablo. I figured once I found it, I should bump it in case anyone else is looking for it.


 pieces of this thread are not true. Caution is advised when reading the thread.



You mean like when you accused Matthew of slander for claiming that Pablo says to practice Omerta and then he threw the link at you silencing you? You that part was pretty untrue that you wrote. Got it...


Libel, not slander. Slander is spoken, libel is written. People make mistakes. I don't recall accusing Matthew of libel, though, on this one issue.


This is from my old post...

From Matthew... He has told us personally that he practices Omerta, which is normally associated with the Mafia.  

My response: I will not deal with hearsay or rumors, and neither should anyone else.

That is what I said about that. I stand corrected, but I didn't accuse Matthew of libel or slander.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Pablo - Paul Hernandez - the Crisis in Kentucky
« Reply #68 on: March 31, 2016, 03:23:40 PM »
Manuel, you can't make generic "poison the well" statements. If there's something inaccurate, please address it specifically.

The original post has been modified and updated, and several response posts have been deleted.

Pablo - Paul Hernandez - the Crisis in Kentucky
« Reply #69 on: March 31, 2016, 03:42:32 PM »
Quote from: Matthew
Manuel, you can't make generic "poison the well" statements. If there's something inaccurate, please address it specifically.

The original post has been modified and updated, and several response posts have been deleted.


I needed to make it clear that biases and incomplete information can distort the truth of any situation, and that it is best to seek verification of any presented information.

Pablo was accused of animal sacrifices, for one, in at least a few posts on this site. That is mainly inaccurate. While a dog was burned, it was not a sacrifice, nor was Pablo involved in that decision.

I did not seek to poison the well, but just to caution against forming a judgement against the seminary or Pablo based solely on the writing in this thread.

Take my post like the food warning labels. The food may be fine, but it is always best to take care.

This thread may contain trace amounts of Peanuts...