Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Author Topic: Help needed re Fr. Roberts  (Read 6444 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Last Tradhican

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2017, 08:14:53 PM »
Quote from: Fanny on December 27, 2017, 12:40:57 PM
Fr. Pfeiffer is "friends" with perverts and laicised priests (Fr. Roberts,  Mr. Cordaro, Mr. Tetherow) and bringing them to OLMC.  
What will it take for people to wake up and say enough is enough?
Laicized and perverts is not being precise. Are all three ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs? If so, three strikes and Fr. Pfieffer is out. Not a good sign.
Logged

Offline Fanny

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2017, 08:35:15 PM »
Quote from: Last Tradhican on December 28, 2017, 08:14:53 PM
Laicized and perverts is not being precise. Are all three ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs? If so, three strikes and Fr. Pfieffer is out. Not a good sign.
Fr. Roberts is a perv, not laicised as I have found.

Mr. Cordaro is laicised.  Not a perv as I have found, but he is "good friends" with Mr. Tetherow.  They both live in Scranton, PA.

Mr. Tetherow is a confessed and convicted  perv and laicised.
Logged

Offline obediens

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #17 on: December 28, 2017, 09:20:32 PM »
There is no proof that Cordaro was laicized, unlike Tetherow. The language used in the description of Cordaro seems to indicate suspension, not laicization, it is the same kind of language used for other vaguses and independent priests. If he was laicized, such a monitum would explicitly say so. 
Logged

Offline Fanny

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #18 on: December 28, 2017, 09:38:13 PM »
Quote from: obediens on December 28, 2017, 09:20:32 PM
There is no proof that Cordaro was laicized, unlike Tetherow. The language used in the description of Cordaro seems to indicate suspension, not laicization, it is the same kind of language used for other vaguses and independent priests. If he was laicized, such a monitum would explicitly say so.
"This notice is to inform the Christian faithful that John
J. Cordaro, formerly a priest of the Oblates of Saint Joseph,
was dismissed from the Oblates by their Superior General on
August 8, 1989. He currently has no faculties whatsoever to
minister in the Catholic Church. Because he has no faculties,
he is forbidden to function as a priest in the Roman Catholic
Church. Furthermore, the Catholic faithful should not receive
the sacraments from Mr. Cordaro or attend his celebration of
the sacraments, wherever they may be held."


"Mr." means he was laicised.  
Logged

Offline Samuel

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #19 on: December 28, 2017, 11:57:51 PM »
Quote from: MaterDominici on December 28, 2017, 07:38:26 PM
No, not what I was saying.
Samuel is accusing Clavis David of being "in the other camp" as if he's either on Team A or Team B.
I'm saying there's nothing wrong with thinking for yourself and not picking a team. Both teams could be good, bad, or in between.

No, not what I was saying either.

I am voicing my suspicion that "Clavis David" belongs to Team C, or to be precise, team M.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
« previous next »