Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The real Archbishop? ( A response to Fr. Robinson's new article)  (Read 2326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: The real Archbishop? ( A response to Fr. Robinson's new article)
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2018, 08:12:12 AM »

And as Fr. Robinson keeps writing, it can only mean the SSPX needs cover, cause their "prelature deal" is still on.
Bingo.

Re: The real Archbishop? ( A response to Fr. Robinson's new article)
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2018, 12:22:55 PM »
Nice find Mr. G.

We have to realize that the SSPX has a history of using "homemade theologians" to publish articles against their competitors in Tradition.


A short list.

1. Father Cekada (1981) article attacking Father Wathen and the Order of St. John.
 Father Wathen rebutted Fr. Cekada in 1983 disproving Fr. Cekada's claims and demonstrating it was an SSPX "hit piece".

2. Fr. Lainsey & Fr. Tim Pfeiffer's 2001 boogeyman book "Is Feenyism Catholic".
 Father Wathen rhetoricaly decapitiated Fr. Lainsey, proving the SSPX priest's anecdotal extrapolations and
  weak knowledge of Holy Scriptures.

3. Siscoe & Salza's 2016 "True or False Pope" a laughable, literary fiasco by two amateur writers.

3. Father Robinson's Prelature/tradition defense earlier in 2017.  So detached from reality, one thinks "mind control".
We could add many more to your list, like the article about the new bishop consecration formula being valid.

Re: the "homemade theologians", I call them "the usual suspects" from the movie Casablanca , the general has been shot, round up the usual suspects. "We need to write a piece about the new consecration formula for bishops, because Cardinal Ratzinger is now the pope, round up the usual suspects".


Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: The real Archbishop? ( A response to Fr. Robinson's new article)
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2018, 01:23:37 PM »


Quote
Seriously, what Fr. Robinson is basically saying is that all of these persons (4 Resistance Bishops, the Dominicans in Avrille, the Capuchins of Morgon, the dozens of priests, and the thousands of Resistance faithful) are incapable of basic reading comprehension.  It would mean that they lack the intellect needed to read the Archbishop “in context.”

Great quotes in this rebuttal article.  The SSPX's propaganda would've had more effect if it was written right after +Williamson was kicked out and the resistence was in its infancy.  Currently, Such 'smear campaigns' by the sspx are obviously petty and baseless, since the Resistence is growing and its members have plenty of 'street cred'.  

Re: The real Archbishop? ( A response to Fr. Robinson's new article)
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2018, 07:35:41 PM »
No "twisted views" with the "Feeneyites."  Would that all priests would walk back to reconsider and pray over the "views" of Fr. Feeney and Fr. Wathen.  These two are the twin lights showing the way to remain in grace and unharmed during this time of Church turmoil.  They are not "nobodies" or "lightweights." Much less are they priests to be laughed at - as Fr. Pfeiffer did with Who Shall Ascend? one night when he used it to rip into Fr. Wathen at Winona.  It isn't to be wondered that if God raised up these priests for His service on their "issues," the way He raised up the Archbishop to keep the true line of ordinations going, and then these priests are ignored or mocked -- it is, again, not to be wondered at that the resulting implosion or lack of virtue on so many fronts (not just the SSPX), shows His blessing is not there. The casual treatment of the words of Our Lord and the easy involvement with various "Masses" and the giving out blindly of Jesus Christ to anyone who shows up at the Communion rail - when it does not have to be so, and when there are Church laws and disciplines to cover these acts - such abuses cry to Heaven.  We are not involved in some mere business or competition.  It is the True Religion and worship of God.  What does He get from us, willy-nilly, His traditionalist servants - His supposedly "superior," true Catholics?