Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5

Author Topic: Help needed re Fr. Roberts  (Read 6686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Smedley Butler

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2017, 10:49:07 AM »
Quote from: MaterDominici on December 27, 2017, 12:18:42 AM
I find it odd how much the general opinion of Fr. Roberts has swung so much between now and the last time he was a major topic of conversation here on CathInfo. The best conclusion I can reach is that those who really had the first-hand information about Fr. were not involved in the discussion here several years ago. At that time, there was a least one member who wrote a long statement praising Father and his abilities as a priest. As someone who's never met Fr. Roberts and only read about him here on this site, my opinion at the time was that he was someone "in the wrong place at the wrong time" when he was involved with the SSJ. Clearly, now, there are several members -- a least a couple who are longtime members here -- who know personally that his problems are not limited to his time with the SSJ.

My personal opinion of Bp Williamson's tacit approval of Fr. Roberts as a Resistance priest is that he doesn't believe that, as Fanny put it, "a tiger never loses his stripes." My hunch is that he agreed to offer Confirmations in Fr. Robert's chapel because he didn't have any recent accusations against him.
People have short memories and/or don't have all the facts. This list of pedo priests ought to be super pinned to protect the unaware faithful who are having garbage foisted upon them who can harm their children.
Logged

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2017, 10:59:42 AM »
Well, the reason for Father Roberts' explusion from Christ the King were well known at STAS among the seminarians pretty much from the day he set foot there.  But Marshall (at the time) spun it to the seminary staff as a fabrication to persecute him for being too traditional.  Similarly, Urrutigoity said he was being persecuted for being an opponent of sedevacantism and that the allegations of his improper conduct in Argentina were also fabricated just to persecute him.
Logged

Offline Fanny

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2017, 11:16:58 AM »
Quote from: Smedley Butler on December 27, 2017, 10:45:17 AM
Stay away from Cor Mariae that's Fr.Pfeiffer's board.
Ablf3 has better records/docuŠ¼ents.
I thought cor Marie put up an announcement that she was not going to allow posts regarding fr. Roberts?
It had to be buried in a thread titled "
Catholics and Protestants praying with Jews"?
Logged

Offline Fanny

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2017, 12:40:57 PM »



Not all...  not Christ the king.
B. Timlin can't count.  He harboured perverts.  B. Williamson has regrets.

I read somewhere that fr. Roberts was asked to leave the last chapel because he was caught smooching a man in the sacristy.  Perhaps this happened after their glowing reviews.

What your foreign friends say doesn't matter.  What the victims say does.  

B. Williamson giving a priestly retreat to a pervert is a far cry from that same pervert working in a seminary, a school, or anywhere with young men.

B. Williamsons past actions make it clear that he does not have to support a priest or agree with him to bring sacraments to the faithful.

B. Williamson makes mistakes.  I am sure he regrets accepting and approving the ordinations of fr. Urutigoity and Mr. Ensey, too.

Anyone who spent any length of time at SSJ is suspect and someone to stay away from, even if there weren't affidavits against him.  Or will it take your son being his next victim before you see clearly?

Fr. Pfeiffer is "friends" with perverts and laicised priests (Fr. Roberts,  Mr. Cordaro, Mr. Tetherow) and bringing them to OLMC.  
What will it take for people to wake up and say enough is enough?
Logged

Offline Smedley Butler

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #9 on: December 27, 2017, 01:38:10 PM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on December 27, 2017, 10:59:42 AM
Well, the reason for Father Roberts' explusion from Christ the King were well known at STAS among the seminarians pretty much from the day he set foot there.  But Marshall (at the time) spun it to the seminary staff as a fabrication to persecute him for being too traditional.  Similarly, Urrutigoity said he was being persecuted for being an opponent of sedevacantism and that the allegations of his improper conduct in Argentina were also fabricated just to persecute him.
As did Fr. Pfeiffer in his open letter. They're all just being "persecuted" instead of being rejected for being perverts.
Nonsense. 
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
« previous next »