...The exclusion is merely one final blow...
Interpreted, this says that the 'exclusion' is not THE final blow, but ONE OF
(perhaps) TWO OR MORE final blows. And what would the other(s) be? Well,
they would be of the same order as the 'one' that's already occurred, that is,
the so-called 'exculsion' of an SSPX bishop. And so, how could that happen
a second or a third time? Well, there are two other bishops in the SSPX who
could potentially suffer a similar so-called 'exclusion,' are there not?
Get it?
________________________________________________________________
(Regarding the next quote):
You could avoid all this by using the hyphen instead of the forward slash.
Forward slash and colon don't work in most PC filenames because it is too
confusing for the computer. That's the habit that spills over to these thread
titles. Go "10-27-2012" and your date will show up just fine. Better yet, if
you want to organize your archives use 2012-10-27 and then they will
automatically store in chronological order. TA-DA! (methinks that has an
etymology in the
Te Deum - because "Teh-Deh" would sound like "today.")
(Also, ask any trumpet player, "ta-da" is how you play two fast notes, by the
necessary "tonguing" of the instrument.)
Thread title:
"Eleison Comments 1027"
Hm... My last one was EC 275... how come I missed about 750 ECs in just one week... ?!
:scratchchin:
Actually, it is EC 276. The starter of this thread chose to put the date it was published.
Blame on Matthew for refusing communion to the slashes into the thread title.
That would've certainly avoid the confusion. :smile:
But as long as Matthew allows +Williamson's slashes on Liberalism, I forgive him. :cheers: