Author Topic: Eleison Comments 276  (Read 7543 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AntiFellayism

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 229
  • Reputation: +798/-0
  • Gender: Male
Eleison Comments 276
« on: October 27, 2012, 01:33:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • MOMENTOUS DECISION

    So the exclusion from the Society of St Pius X of one of the four bishops consecrated for its service by Archbishop Lefebvre in 1988 is now official. It is a momentous decision on the part of the SSPX leaders, not for any personal reasons, but because of the removal of what many people took to be the single biggest obstacle within the SSPX to any false reconciliation between Catholic Tradition and Conciliar Rome. Now that he is gone, the SSPX may the more easily continue its slide into comfortable liberalism.

    If the problem was merely his person, there might be no serious consequences. He is 72 years old (and “more or less gaga”) with not too many active years left ahead of him. He could be safely ignored, or further discredited if need be, and left to rant and rave in his isolated retirement. But if indeed his exclusion does mean the repudiation of that opposition to Rome which he represented, then the SSPX is in trouble, and far from resolving its interior tensions by having made an example of him, it is liable now to be racked with silent dissension or open contradiction.

    This is because Archbishop Lefebvre founded the SSPX to resist the Council’s destruction of the Catholic Faith by its 16 documents, and of the practice of that Faith by the New Mass above all. Resisting the Council was built into the very nature of the Society. Now to undo a thing’s nature is to undo the thing. It would follow that with this exclusion the SSPX of Archbishop Lefebvre is well on its way to being undone, and it will be replaced by something quite different. Actually that transformation has been observable for many years. The exclusion is merely one final blow.

    Not that the Archbishop was primarily, or only, against the Council. Primarily he was Catholic, a Catholic bishop, a true pastor of souls, as is clear from his writings prior to the Council. But once that unspeakable disaster for the Church had taken place, he soon saw that the most urgent task in defence of the Faith was to resist the Vatican II Revolution which was taking over millions and millions of Catholic hearts and minds. Hence his founding in 1970 of the SSPX which would use exclusively the Tridentine rite of Mass. Hence his famous Declaration of November, 1974, which was like a charter of the Catholic principles inspiring the SSPX’s resistance. Only the conversion and reversion of the Church authorities to the true Faith can justify the abandoning of those principles. And has such a conversion or reversion taken place ? By no means. On the contrary.
    And the future ? To fill the vacuum left by abandoning the purposes of the Archbishop, probably the mainstream SSPX now hastens into the arms of Rome, especially if Benedict XVI’s conscience is driving him to end the “schism” before he dies. The bishop’s exclusion may or may not have been a pre-condition set by Rome for a Rome-SSPX agreement, but in any case it certainly favours one. SSPX priests who see clear might lie low for the moment and wait for a flock of chickens to begin to come home to roost. SSPX laity might attend SSPX Masses for the time being, but they should watch out for the moment when the transformation mentioned above begins to threaten their faith. As for the excluded bishop, any donations to him or his cause will have to wait a little until the necessary arrangements can be set up. But be sure of one thing: he is not thinking of retiring.

    Hang tight, everybody. We are in for one “helluva” ride. Let’s just make that a ride to Heaven !

    Kyrie eleison.
    And now, we have a perfectly liberal Pope, my very dear brothers. As he goes to this country [the United States]which is founded upon Masonic principles, that is, of a revolution, of a rebellion against God. And, well, he expressed his admira

    Offline Seraphia

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 199
    • Reputation: +431/-1
    • Gender: Female
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #1 on: October 27, 2012, 01:44:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And the Lion has roared! God Bless Bishop Williamson!


    Offline sedetrad

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1585
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #2 on: October 27, 2012, 01:47:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Agreed! Tradition now has a true pastor and bishop unencumbered by scandal to lead the fight! Bravo!

    Offline Domitilla

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 479
    • Reputation: +1009/-29
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #3 on: October 27, 2012, 01:48:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "... he is not thinking of retiring."

    "Hang tight, everybody.  We are in for one "helluva ride.  Let's just make that a ride to Heaven!"

    What joy to read those words from His Excellency.  I am boarding his plane and fastening my seatbelt. I look forward to that ride.

    May our Good God send a host of Angels to protect, defend, and guide His Excellency, +Williamson.

    Offline ServusSpiritusSancti

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8213
    • Reputation: +7164/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #4 on: October 27, 2012, 01:48:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Awesome edition of EC this week. Glad that +Williamson won't be retiring.

    God Bless the good Bishop.


    Offline Ethelred

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1222
    • Reputation: +2266/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #5 on: October 27, 2012, 02:30:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • A momentous Eleison Comment.  And also good comments here in this thread.
    Thank you Your Excelleny, and thank you friends of H.E. here on Cathinfo.

    I do like the feisty way of Bishop Williamson speaking now -- now that he escaped Bp. Fellay's Neo-SSPX dungeon...



    P.S. But what is Menzingen doing now? Yes, they can still bite the carpet but not write any threatening e-letter to Wimbledon anymore... I like that thought.

    Offline Miseremini

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1576
    • Reputation: +1031/-124
    • Gender: Female
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #6 on: October 27, 2012, 02:38:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • SSPX priests who see clear might lie low for the moment and wait for a flock of chickens to begin to come home to roost. SSPX laity might attend SSPX Masses for the time being, but they should watch out for the moment when the transformation mentioned above begins to threaten their faith. As for the excluded bishop, any donations to him or his cause will have to wait a little until the necessary arrangements can be set up. But be sure of one thing: he is not thinking of retiring.
    [/b]   :applause:


    Finally, direct, clear and concise instructions for us.

    God Bless His Excellency ! ! !
    "Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered: and them that hate Him flee from before His Holy Face"  Psalm 67:2[/b]


    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5020
    • Reputation: +3826/-28
    • Gender: Male
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #7 on: October 27, 2012, 02:48:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • YES!

    This is what we were waiting to hear, thank you Your Excellency!


    Offline Ethelred

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1222
    • Reputation: +2266/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #8 on: October 27, 2012, 02:54:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thread title:
    "Eleison Comments 1027"

    Hm... My last one was EC 275...  how come I missed about 750 ECs in just one week... ?!  

     :scratchchin:

    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5020
    • Reputation: +3826/-28
    • Gender: Male
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #9 on: October 27, 2012, 03:01:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ethelred
    Thread title:
    "Eleison Comments 1027"

    Hm... My last one was EC 275...  how come I missed about 750 ECs in just one week... ?!  

     :scratchchin:


    Must be a new 'freudian slip' His Excellency let through making apparent his new mindset of attack with Menzingen!  :smirk:

    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5020
    • Reputation: +3826/-28
    • Gender: Male
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #10 on: October 27, 2012, 03:02:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • When he's ready, count me in as one of the Williamson Zouaves!


    Offline Quo Vadis Petre

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1227
    • Reputation: +1176/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #11 on: October 27, 2012, 03:07:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ethelred
    Thread title:
    "Eleison Comments 1027"

    Hm... My last one was EC 275...  how come I missed about 750 ECs in just one week... ?!  

     :scratchchin:


    Actually, it is EC 276. The starter of this thread chose to put the date it was published.
    "In our time more than ever before, the greatest asset of the evil-disposed is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigour of Satan's reign is due to the easy-going weakness of Catholics." -St. Pius X

    "If the Church were not divine, this

    Offline AntiFellayism

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 229
    • Reputation: +798/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #12 on: October 27, 2012, 04:05:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre
    Quote from: Ethelred
    Thread title:
    "Eleison Comments 1027"

    Hm... My last one was EC 275...  how come I missed about 750 ECs in just one week... ?!  

     :scratchchin:


    Actually, it is EC 276. The starter of this thread chose to put the date it was published.


    Blame on Matthew for refusing communion to the slashes into the thread title.

    That would've certainly avoid the confusion.  :smile:

    But as long as Matthew allows +Williamson's slashes on Liberalism, I forgive him.  :cheers:


    And now, we have a perfectly liberal Pope, my very dear brothers. As he goes to this country [the United States]which is founded upon Masonic principles, that is, of a revolution, of a rebellion against God. And, well, he expressed his admira

    Offline magdalena

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2047
    • Reputation: +1805/-39
    • Gender: Female
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #13 on: October 27, 2012, 04:35:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Domitilla
    "... he is not thinking of retiring."

    "Hang tight, everybody.  We are in for one "helluva ride.  Let's just make that a ride to Heaven!"

    What joy to read those words from His Excellency.  I am boarding his plane and fastening my seatbelt. I look forward to that ride.

    May our Good God send a host of Angels to protect, defend, and guide His Excellency, +Williamson.


     :applause:
    But one thing is necessary. Mary hath chosen the best part, which shall not be taken away from her.
    Luke 10:42

    Offline magdalena

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2047
    • Reputation: +1805/-39
    • Gender: Female
    Eleison Comments 276
    « Reply #14 on: October 27, 2012, 04:58:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There's always place for another Te Deum.



    Tradition is alive and well.  
    But one thing is necessary. Mary hath chosen the best part, which shall not be taken away from her.
    Luke 10:42

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16