Although this is amusing, Perhaps we should not condemn Bishop Pfeiffer for this action unless we are willing to condemn Bishop Zendejas because he was consecrated in a similar need, though the orders were more regular. In Pfeiffer's mind, if he is genuine and not a scoundrel grifter, the faith was reduced to a small number and they needed a bishop. Even the Pope, Michael, was willing to reach out to the schismatics for valid orders when in need of consecration.
I've spoken about this before. I am well aware of the justification for consecrating bishops without a Papal mandate during a time of crisis.
That doesn't mean every Traditional Catholic Tom Dick and Harry should get themselves consecrated a bishop in 2020. I'll give you a pass; perhaps I've read more traditional books on the priesthood, and writings of many saints and Doctors of the Church on the topic of Episcopal dignity, than you have.
I remember criticizing Bp. Slupski for *much weaker* reasons than the criticisms of Fr./Bp. Pfeiffer to a deacon at the SSPX seminary, during an Ignatian retreat. He said that we can't criticize a priest *just* for getting himself consecrated for the sake of necessity -- it would undermine the justification for what +ABL did (and more recently, what +Williamson did). I expected him to chime in with the criticism -- his opposition took me by surprise.
So I'm well aware of that.
But Bp. Slupski was an honest man who was isolated and saw a need to provide for after he was gone. Fr. Pfeiffer has desired the honor of the Episcopacy since at least 2012, and his desire and ambition were so great that once he was turned down, and his seminary refused, Fr. Pfeiffer was willing to split with, attack, and lie about Bp. Williamson for years on end ever since!
Getting consecrated during a Crisis in the Church is not cause for criticism. SEEKING the episcopacy, against all advice, against the wisdom of your elders and superiors, adhering to demonic men like Pablo, promoting pedophile and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ priests, promoting fraudulent con-men like Ambrose, destroying vocations by seeking out pious young men (who might have vocations!) and keeping them in a slipshod, inadequate, discipline-free, curriculum-free seminary for years on end -- those are things to criticize.