CathInfo.com

If Trump is for/against something/anything, then why won’t he just come out and say it instead of mincing words? If his position was crystal clear there wouldn’t be anyone saying “well he really meant this…or that…” but instead it’s talking in circles trying to play both sides. At the end of the day, we’re all being played!

Of course, Trump is somewhat controlled.  But that’s an advantage to us because it buys us time.  The pushback is a good thing; you act like it’s bad. ??  The slower the elites have to go with their plans, the shorter will be their time of triumph, as the year 2029 comes closer, so does Our Lady’s victory.  And they know it.

Controlled opposition is not all bad.  In the grand scheme of things, I cant change the course of politics by one inch, so I thank God for controlled opposition which is a blessing, in a sense.  It’s better than having a Lenin or Stalin in charge and bring thrown into prison tomorrow.

I think the only thing buying us time is a combination of enough Catholics saying the rosary(our only remaining weapon according to Sister Lucia) and the elites still refining AI to operate their central bank digital currency/biometric surveillance beast system. 
The Red Sea pedestrians have never had this much full spectrum dominance across the economy, media, academia, politics. Nor has the public ever been thoroughly brainwashed. They aren't going to waste this opportunity. I think they jumped the gun a bit with the covid pandemic. That was their attempt to partially roll out some elements of the system, acclimate the public to it, study the reaction. 
Virtually no one in conspiracy circles saw the Covid thing coming, despite some predictive programming in movies.
The fact that they could essentially shut down the world demonstrated how deeply they penetrated every government from top to bottom. 
Those at the highest level are working in accordance with some kabbalistic timetable to usher in their savage messiah. 
2030 seems to be the date that is set by those lovely folks at the World Economic Forum

Right, because the President has executive powers, as head of the Military.


But the President doesn't have executive powers to stop people from buying milk or to tell doctors what they can and can't do in their own hospitals.  You need a civics lesson.

I've looked everywhere and I CANNOT find where executive orders are limited to specific areas ( miltary etc) They ARE subject to judicial review and can be vetoed by Congress. Obama made many Mental Health initiatives by executive order. Please provide information that shows me that a president could NOT at least put a moratorium on transgender surgeries for minors.


Limits on Executive Orders
Executive orders are not unchecked strokes of power from the president's pen; they can be challenged and deemed unlawful by federal courts. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court determined during the Korean War that executive orders must fit within a certain sphere of power and cannot simply defy Congressional intent.
Although this area of law remains in flux, executive orders have the most legitimacy when the president is acting with the implied or express authority of Congress. However, these executive orders may still legally shape policy if the laws or Congress have been silent on an issue.