Author Topic: What is a Troll? (Read 11794 times)

trickster · « **Reply #15 on:** July 12, 2014, 01:24:30 AM »

Quote from: MyrnaM

Troll ---> :ape:

Hi MyrnaM :)

bruce

trickster · « **Reply #16 on:** July 12, 2014, 01:25:55 AM »

Quote from: glaston

Quote from: trickster
Honestly guys. I keep getting called a troll, so at least I deserve an explanation of what that is :)

Trickster
Bruce Ferguson

Masons are told to study the sagas as they reach a certain degree.
Royal Arch Masons are obsessed with bridges in fact they make pictures of their degrees as steps forming a bridge with Templar degrees on the other side.
Troll of course contains their signature 'twin' mark (their "two Johns" etc) & is associated with Norse mythology in the saga and a bridge!

Remember Holland WW2 failure in Arnhem against Tanks + 'key' Bridge?

TOTALLY lost me glaston :) Perhaps you can simplify for me?

trickster
bruce ferguson

trickster · « **Reply #17 on:** July 12, 2014, 01:28:30 AM »

Quote from: glaston

B.F.

I also know indians were used as radio comms men in WW2 as nαzιs couldn't decipher languages.

A number of Indians were early on made into freemasons too!

A freemason Indian saved a trooper officer freemason in 1800's from being scalped and shot by fellow injuns!

PS
Which Pope used to blatantly kiss the airport runway (APRON) as soon as he landed in a country?

AWesome Glaston. Yes I knew about the Navajo code talkers..your right. I am interested in your connecting our people with the Masons... i have never heard that before. Perhaps you could expand and/or refer me to some sources.

That is awesometh, thank you so much for that info.

In terms of the pope kissing .... I can only think of what many call an anti-pope, but since I am novus ordo, was it our beloved and now saint Pope JP II?

Bruce

trickster · « **Reply #18 on:** July 12, 2014, 01:35:14 AM »

Quote from: Lighthouse

PED:

Quote
I do not include new people to the forum in this, who are asking honest questions and engaging in robust debate (as long as there is no blasphemy or other insult to the Father).

Yeah, like trans-dressing men wearing horns and pretending to be nuns. Surely no one on a trad Catholic forum would take that to be blasphemy. Just a bunch of close buddies having fun.

And, of course, the best way to deal with a pagan, Islam, or Protestant is to talk to them and learn what you are missing. The Catholic Church didn't get everything right, ya know?

Lighthouse, what is your point? Are you against novus ordo catholics talking to traditional catholics? We have the same history and heritage. I was baptized in 1957 and the last time i checked that was before the Vatican, i even recieved communion prior to the changes in the Vatican. Why would you separate yourself from me? I don't separate my brothers and sisters in the old order church (guess that is the opposite of new order church).

The best way to deal with a pagan, etc., you are absolutely right and that is to listen to them! The church of old did exactly that in the 1600s at the Salinas Missions in New Mexico as an example. The best tool for evangelization and to offer people the message of Our Lord Jesus is to put it in terms that are culturally and socially sensible. Talking to pagans, protestants and even novus ordo catholics is also about building trust which creates an openess and love to actuallly hear and understand.. and that is the point of conversion.

If I am misunderstanding your intent (i.e if you are just being sarcastic in a humourous way I apologize for my understanding)...but your comments are confusing. (and I thought I'm supposed to be the trickster :)

Bruce

trickster · « **Reply #19 on:** July 12, 2014, 01:42:35 AM »

Quote from: PerEvangelicaDicta

I was making a general statement about new Catholic members who ask honest questions. You may have been reading too much into my statement.
There are new and "old" members who do get into robust debates, but, for the record, I do not support ecuмenism in any way, shape, form. The Church cannot and should never budge an iota from Her teachings. If a heretic comes to Her (say, through this forum) then we should instruct them in Truth, as He commanded us to do, without compromise.

As to the specifics you noted, Lighthouse, I did see your post in the previous thread and commented accordingly. It is scandalous.

Thanks for those words PerEvangelicalDicta...With or without ecuмenism (which by the way is not compromise...the meetings with Benedict at Assisi were prayers said seperately, but respected quietly by each other)...that doesn't sound relativisitic to me. Ecuмenism is not about selling out; it is about understanding and from there respecting the choice of others and finding other common ways in which we can work together to further Our Father's will and Our Lord's directions. I don't see how ecuмenism in any way or from a budging of catholicism.

I support dialogue. Conversion sometimes comes indirectly by something a Buddhist may have said that answers a question that troubles our heart and somehow informs and issue we have been working on...just sometimes a different lens sees things that we can't see.

As an example, as an indigenous person I see things from an indigenous perspective that is sometimes balanced by the views of non-native people and I know the opposite is true...so talking to people who differ from us is good, and we remember that God created all of us so who are we to turn our back on God's work? JUst some thoughts.

Bruce