Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 21

Author Topic: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning  (Read 18213 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline poche

Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
« Reply #50 on: January 07, 2020, 11:01:07 PM »
Quote from: Mark 79 on January 06, 2020, 09:13:21 PM
It's almost that time when Poche does his drive-by. At the risk of repeating myself…

Honest mistakes are random. Your "mistakes" are not random, but are always skewed to support your Judaizing.

An honest man does not defend honest mistakes by piling lies on top of lies.

You falsified Scripture about 2 months ago: https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/is-francis-the-pope/msg674301/#msg674301

You were immediately called on it.

Instead of immediately claiming it was a mistake, it took you about 5 weeks to pile on another lie pretending you meant to make an inference, a rather tangential and contrived inference, "that those who invincibly do not know that the Catholic Church is the true Church can be saved."

Then you claimed your lies were "prudential silence."

Then you made your fake apology without admitting your lie.

You even claimed you went to confession. What did you confess? "Bless me Father for I have made a mistake"???

That sequence of behavior is NOT a "mistake."

You have displayed the same pattern with your other lies, e.g., "preached against the тαℓмυd," "paraphrasing St. Paul," "the same view [Pope St. Pius X v. Jorge the Worst]," etc.

An honest man called on a genuine mistake would have immediately said two months ago: "Oh, I made a mistake. Sorry."

But you are not an honest man, you are an abject, willful, habitual, unrepentant, serial liar.
It took me awhile to understand what you were talking about.
Logged

Offline poche

Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
« Reply #51 on: January 07, 2020, 11:04:01 PM »
Quote from: Mark 79 on January 07, 2020, 04:25:22 PM
Exactly.  It reminds me of one of the craziest and most contemptible passages in the тαℓмυd excusing “unwitting” sodomy [Sanhedrin 54b] as if such an unnatural and intrinsically difficult act could be accidental or a "mistake."

Analogously, Poche had his "greater idea" and wanted to justify his "greater idea," so he accidentally made a "mistake" of falsifying Scripture to accomplish his goal—and then publicizes his confession of his "mistake"?

Who is stupid enough to such a sequence of blatant manipulative lies and misdirection? Oh wait, we know who.
I am sorry but I am not familiar with the тαℓмυd. I prefer to study the Sacred Scripture and the Catechism the study of the тαℓмυd.  
Logged

Offline poche

Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
« Reply #52 on: January 07, 2020, 11:04:36 PM »
Quote from: Bonaventure on January 07, 2020, 02:07:24 PM
I'm still trying to get my head around that one.  How does one, on the one hand, claim that only a simple mistake has occurred (and thus not sinful), but yet on the other hand assert that one has gone to confession with implication that said "sin of mistake" was confessed?  It makes no sense.
I don't discuss what I said in confession.
Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
« Reply #53 on: January 07, 2020, 11:32:10 PM »
Quote from: poche on January 07, 2020, 11:04:01 PM
I am sorry but I am not familiar with the тαℓмυd. I prefer to study the Sacred Scripture and the Catechism the study of the тαℓмυd.  
Let it not be lost on us that you slithered past your own "mistakes."

Dec 28:

Poche: Matthew and Mark79 are right. I did make a mistake in quoting from Matthew. I apologize.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/condemnation-of-poche-errors-and-formal-warning/msg681100/#msg681100

Dec 29:

josefamenendez  called him out: Poche, that was a "mistake' with serious deliberate intention to obfuscate the true meaning of the scripture to support a larger false perception.  ("It" meaning the Church versus "you" meaning Peter). Some people would call that a lie to further an agenda.That's no mistake.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/condemnation-of-poche-errors-and-formal-warning/msg681126/#msg681126

I asked: If you made a mistake, singular, why did you defend the "mistake" with additional "mistakes"?…
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/condemnation-of-poche-errors-and-formal-warning/msg681108/#msg681108

I accused him and posted additional evidence in that thread of Poche piling lies upon lies.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/poche-please-explain/msg681107/#msg681107

Eventually, after a variety of ruses, Poche responded:
I went to confession this morning and the priest gave me absolution.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/poche-please-explain/msg681110/#msg681110

I took that at face value: Then let us all keep a clean slate.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/poche-please-explain/msg681116/#msg681116

Perspicaciously, josefamenendez called Poche on his mockery: I see a lot feigned innocence that is atypical of an autist. Poche is insideously clever in his replies. The depth of certain posts (especially in foreign languages) belies the his childlike responses here. He tends never to answer a question and always misdirects. Hmmmmm... very good bot or serious troll
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/poche-please-explain/msg681124/#msg681124

So, if he hadn't lied, but only made a "mistake," why did he feign (or misdirect) that he confessed?
He attempted to use confession as an alibi. Poche mocked confession.

Jan 4:

Responding to josefamenendez' Dec 29 accusation "serious deliberate intention to obfuscate the true meaning of the scripture to support a larger false perception," Poche stated: You are right. I had a larger idea that I was trying to convey.


Jan 5:

Poche: I see a huge difference between a deliberate lie and an honest mistake.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/condemnation-of-poche-errors-and-formal-warning/msg682408/#msg682408

So, BEFORE AND AFTER feigning repentance at confession (by misdirection), Poche denied (by misdirection) any LIES in his posts. His LIES were merely "mistakes" and "larger ideas." Poche is the one who mocked confession.

*****************

Yet, in sneaking away from your own responsibilities, you confess unfamiliarity with the precepts of those you repeatedly rush to defend.

Since I am familiar with the Master Race genocidal fundamentals of Judaism, I think you are not only stupid, but traitorous, to defend the most misanthropic and most organized opposition to Jesus Christ.

Only-Jews-are-human and "Kill even the best of Gentiles" is what you defend.

“You are called men, but non-Jews are not called men.”
Bava Metzia 114b

Note Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai’s ruling: “…only ‘you,’ the members of the Jєωιѕн people, are called men, but non-Jews are not called men.”




“…although our Sages declared, ‘Kill even the best of the gentiles,’ and that, as mentioned above, the Rambam [Maimonides] states in Hilchot Melachim 8:10 that any gentile who does not accept the seven universal laws commanded to Noah and his descendants should be slain. These directives, however. can be interpreted to apply only in a time of war or in a time when the Jews have control over the gentiles.”




Logged

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Condemnation of Poche Errors and Formal Warning
« Reply #54 on: January 07, 2020, 11:37:50 PM »
Quote from: poche on January 07, 2020, 11:04:36 PM
I don't discuss what I said in confession.

Except that you did discuss it.

In response to incontrovertible evidence of your lies, you reported you went to confession…

and then you continued to claim "mistakes" that were intended to bolster your "greater idea."

You admitted that your "mistakes" were intended to support your "greater idea."

You can't have it both ways.

Either (1) you accidentally and without purpose made a mistake or (2) you willfully intended to serve your "greater idea" and intentionally contrived your "mistake"—an intentional lie to serve your purposes.

Having already confessed to us that you intended to serve your "greater idea," you admitted that you lied—but continue calling your lie a "mistake," stacking, as you habitually do, lie upon lie.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 21
« previous next »