CathInfo.com

You are right. I had a larger idea that I was trying to convey. It is the truth that the Catholic Church is founded by Christ. It was he who instituted the papacy and it was he who named Peter to be the first Pope. Jesus promise is; the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
There have been times during the Roman Empire that almost the entire hierarchy was arrested and put to death. In the early part of the 19th century, Napoleon invaded Italy and arrested the Pope. Napoleon declared, "I shall destroy your Catholic Church!" Where is that Pope now? Or better yet, where is Napoleon today?
Not to say that there are no problems today. But the promise of Christ remains. He also said, "Behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world. "

LOL!Larger idea!!!!Just to distract from the original lie, you misdirected and made the lie larger, and to your favor of course! Poche, you have proven to be a master of deflection! Jesus said to make your yes, yes and your no, no. We all know what Jesus said about the Church and Peter. That's the problem. You changed scripture and we all know it!!!!!. JUST SAY THAT YOU DID and don't go off on a grandiose tangent to show how holy and harmless you are. ( because you are not)  You are just proving the theory that you are here for less than admirable intentions . Your persistent dishonesty amazes me.

It's almost that time when Poche does his drive-by. At the risk of repeating myself…

Honest mistakes are random. Your "mistakes" are not random, but are always skewed to support your Judaizing.

An honest man does not defend honest mistakes by piling lies on top of lies.

You falsified Scripture about 2 months ago: https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/is-francis-the-pope/msg674301/#msg674301

You were immediately called on it.

Instead of immediately claiming it was a mistake, it took you about 5 weeks to pile on another lie pretending you meant to make an inference, a rather tangential and contrived inference, "that those who invincibly do not know that the Catholic Church is the true Church can be saved."

Then you claimed your lies were "prudential silence."

Then you made your fake apology without admitting your lie.

You even claimed you went to confession. What did you confess? "Bless me Father for I have made a mistake"???

That sequence of behavior is NOT a "mistake."

You have displayed the same pattern with your other lies, e.g., "preached against the тαℓмυd," "paraphrasing St. Paul," "the same view [Pope St. Pius X v. Jorge the Worst]," etc.

An honest man called on a genuine mistake would have immediately said two months ago: "Oh, I made a mistake. Sorry."

But you are not an honest man, you are an abject, willful, habitual, unrepentant, serial liar.

Aleah, once again you fail to keep your eye on the ball. It is Poche himself who mocked confession.

Dec 28:

Poche: Matthew and Mark79 are right. I did make a mistake in quoting from Matthew. I apologize.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/condemnation-of-poche-errors-and-formal-warning/msg681100/#msg681100

Dec 29:

josefamenendez  called him out: Poche, that was a "mistake' with serious deliberate intention to obfuscate the true meaning of the scripture to support a larger false perception.  ("It" meaning the Church versus "you" meaning Peter). Some people would call that a lie to further an agenda.That's no mistake.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/condemnation-of-poche-errors-and-formal-warning/msg681126/#msg681126

I asked: If you made a mistake, singular, why did you defend the "mistake" with additional "mistakes"?…
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/condemnation-of-poche-errors-and-formal-warning/msg681108/#msg681108

I accused him and posted additional evidence in that thread of Poche piling lies upon lies.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/poche-please-explain/msg681107/#msg681107

Eventually, after a variety of ruses, Poche responded:
I went to confession this morning and the priest gave me absolution.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/poche-please-explain/msg681110/#msg681110

I took that at face value: Then let us all keep a clean slate.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/poche-please-explain/msg681116/#msg681116

Perspicaciously, josefamenendez called Poche on his mockery: I see a lot feigned innocence that is atypical of an autist. Poche is insideously clever in his replies. The depth of certain posts (especially in foreign languages) belies the his childlike responses here. He tends never to answer a question and always misdirects. Hmmmmm... very good bot or serious troll
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/poche-please-explain/msg681124/#msg681124

So, if he hadn't lied, but only made a "mistake," why did he feign (or misdirect) that he confessed?
He attempted to use confession as an alibi. Poche mocked confession.

Jan 4:

Responding to josefamenendez' Dec 29 accusation "serious deliberate intention to obfuscate the true meaning of the scripture to support a larger false perception," Poche stated: You are right. I had a larger idea that I was trying to convey.


Jan 5:

Poche: I see a huge difference between a deliberate lie and an honest mistake.
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/condemnation-of-poche-errors-and-formal-warning/msg682408/#msg682408

So, BEFORE AND AFTER feigning repentance at confession (by misdirection), Poche denied (by misdirection) any LIES in his posts. His LIES were merely "mistakes" and "larger ideas." Poche is the one who mocked confession.