Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?  (Read 3009 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2022, 08:08:56 AM »
Visual evidence of the ISS orbiting the Earth in front of a much bigger moon:



But all ISS footage is from a pool in Area51 or so :facepalm:

Because there's no way you can fake a video!

And there's no way that NASA would produce a video that tends to defend them! If they made a video, it would definitely be official and on the NASA website. They would never post video(s) on Youtube under a private account or something.

(Are you that naive? Really?)

Has anyone duplicated this feat? Because the Flat Earth proponents have produced not one, but many hundreds of videos BY DIFFERENT PEOPLE proving one can see "too far" for a curved or globe earth. It's much harder to dismiss all that evidence (plus all the other evidence).

It's more logical, and simpler, to dismiss this one video.

And you can't forget the fact that virtually all the ISS footage is faked. Why fake it, if the thing is real? There should NOT be air bubbles rising up from "astronauts" supposedly floating in outer space! Why are astronauts clearly caught playing with invisible objects, getting tangled in harnesses, etc. I can't just ignore that, even if I wanted to believe your video here.

And the video evidence proving NASA fraud is taken FROM NASA ITSELF. Not videos produced by debunkers, which could theoretically be doctored/faked.

Why are there no videos, anywhere, of the ISS being built?
*crickets*

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2022, 08:22:11 AM »
I think that there's something floating around out there that they call the ISS, but it's not what they claim.  There's way too much fake footage from "ISS".  There was no video of its construction, and there are a few "pictures" of ISS that are obviously fake ... looked like a pathetic plastic model.  There are no people up on whatever that is floating aroud up there.


Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2022, 08:30:06 AM »
But all ISS footage is from a pool in Area51 or so :facepalm:

No, the main pool is in Russia but much of the footage is from within the underwater "training" facility at Johnson (I visited it one time).

Many of the ISS "spacewalk" videos feature air bubbles rising just as if they were under water (because they are), and there's one video in particular in which you can clearly see the reflection in the astronot's visor of a guy with a camera in SCUBA GEAR.

Some of it's filmed at Johnson, and there's a full underwater life-size replica (so they claim) of ISS in Russia.

Some of the faked footage was done on the "Vomit Comet" plane.  Some of it's done with suspension harnesses.  Much of it features CGI, which regularly glitches out where fake objects disappear or are invisible etc.

So, Dankward, if there's an ISS up there with people on it, why the need for all this obviously fake footage from NASA?

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #18 on: April 09, 2022, 08:33:26 AM »
In my opinion, nowadays official NASA footage from their various missions is mostly not faked, especially the easy to verify things like the ISS footage. Seeing some supposed water bubbles which could be anything really doesn't prove that every single video of NASA and/or the ISS is fake.

No, the bubbles could not "be anything" and there's one video in which a guy in scuba gear can be clearly seen in the astronot's visor.

So, if MOST of the footage isn't faked, then why are they faking any of it at all?

One of the most compelling arguments I've seen that there can't be people up there functioning in "micro-gravity" for any period of time has to do with the "vestibular" system.  In microgravity, the astronauts would quickly lose their visual acuity, sense of balance, would get nauseous, etc.



BTW:  8:45 - 10:33 of this video is a powerful argument for Intelligent Design.  Sure, that incredible complexity involved in the vestibular system just happened to evolve from random mutations.  What a diabolical joke.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2022, 12:11:16 PM »
Great video Lad. And I agree -- I was blown away when they described the vestibular system. I couldn't even design, much less make, such a system. God's wisdom is so many orders of magnitude above ours, it boggles the mind.

Interesting, the two descriptions Our Lord had for the devil: a murderer, and the father of lies.

So the devil's main works are: the exact opposite of CHARITY and the exact opposite of TRUTH.

God is Love; God is Truth. The devil promotes hate and lies.