Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?  (Read 3005 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2022, 12:44:41 PM »
BTW:  8:45 - 10:33 of this video is a powerful argument for Intelligent Design.  Sure, that incredible complexity involved in the vestibular system just happened to evolve from random mutations.  What a diabolical joke.
Well, you see Lad, there was an organism a million trillion years ago that just existed with a partially-formed vestibular system which could only detect up and down, so that just subsisted as a species for another million years and somehow survived until one of its progeny mutated to detect left and right AND was fertile which subsisted for another million years...

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2022, 01:33:14 PM »
Great video Lad. And I agree -- I was blown away when they described the vestibular system. I couldn't even design, much less make, such a system. God's wisdom is so many orders of magnitude above ours, it boggles the mind.

Just the sheer mathematical odds of such a system coming about by random mutations are far smaller than the proverbial sitting monkeys down in front of a typewriter and waiting for them to output the works of Shakespeare.

And that's just one tiny little system in the human body (and other animal bodies).  There are hundreds of other such complex systems where the different parts of it work together for an obviously intended goal.  How does one cell get together with the other cell and coordinate its efforts?  Then on top of that all these sub-systems work together in the body.  It's utterly preposterous.

We can see in 3d because we have TWO eyes placed a certain distance apart.  Just the placement of two eyes is a miracle.  For every creature that had two eyes properly spaced on the front of its head, you'd have a million failed species, some with an eye on the bottom of its feet, another with an eye between its legs, back of its hand, etc.  So just the simple fact of the proper placement of two eyes, each of which randomly developed in its incredible complexity, that defies all mathematical odds.  It would be absolutely laughable if it weren't so evil.

Initially the human body is just one cell that then begins dividing into identical copiest of itself.  What exactly coordinates, "I'm going to go become heart tissue, and you go over there and become bone."

I've tried to play devil's advocate on this to see if I could convince anyone of evolution, and there's absolutely no chance I could even make a single compelling argument for it.  It's driven by nothing more than hatred of God.  That's at the highest level.  At lower levels, people are duped because they're just too lazy to think about it.  "Oh, yeah, moneys and humans sortof look alike ... evolution must be true." ... and then move on to their music videos and video games.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2022, 01:38:15 PM »
And this is the SCIENCE that we're all supposed to be enamored of ... according to Father Paul Robinson et al.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #23 on: April 09, 2022, 01:55:34 PM »
And this is the SCIENCE that we're all supposed to be enamored of ... according to Father Paul Robinson et al.

In one of the many Creationist videos I watched (by some protestant), it talked about mathematical odds.

Scientists (mainstream and otherwise) teach that anything more than 10 to the 80th power is basically considered "impossible". And to get one DNA strand it would take 10 to the 250th power, for example. Don't quote me on the numbers.  It might have been 10 to the 150 to be impossible and 10 to the 230 to get a single DNA strand.

But to use a term evolutionists like to use, "our monkey brains" get baffled by such numbers. We picture 80 widgets and think that 250 widgets isn't so far away. We have NO grasp of the exponential function, or exponential numbers. It blows our minds how different 10 to the 80th is compared to 10 to the 250th. It is so far outside our common everyday human experiences, we can't even conceive or grasp it.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: What do mainstream geocentrists say about NASA?
« Reply #24 on: April 09, 2022, 06:02:06 PM »
Here's an interview with Kubrick in 1999 ... just weeks before his death.  I haven't seen this debunked.  Here he admits helping to film/fake the moonlandings.  He was dead by March of 1999.