CathInfo.com

No, I don’t trust google and I certainly don’t trust NASA, but whether it’s a google globe or the one in my living room, what I posted demonstrates, fairly accurately, what a global Earth would look like.

There is not a single model that any FE adherent has posted that even remotely demonstrates a workable FE. Sorry.

This guy mapped out the sunrise and sunset times on the FE map.



https://www.bitchute.com/video/P543CpzH3nDa/

Why do all of the top university scientists believe man evolved from apes?

Why do the top scientists and doctors believe the rona scam?

These are very opinionated topics, and I would probably disagree on your preestablished view on them. Bleeding edge research is going on at both of those.

But the globe is established since about two millenia. So if people disagree with this historic and contemporary consensus, there should be good, waterproof reasons for that. I think it's problematic that there is so little scientific ground to stand on for FE, so far. I think there are good reasons for why that is.

If there are opposing scientific hypotheses, usually there are proponents on both sides until the argument is settled. The problem I and many others are seeing with FE is that the quality of FE material is so low: Youtube videos, blog posts, essays at best. There is way too little high level scientific work going on, too little evidence, there just isn't much to show on this very important front for FE (a formalized model, research papers, studies, peer review, serious books, reputable scientists, etc.), even when taking into account funding, societal pressure and other obvious disadvantages, because these are modern developments, although the ideas of FE and GE are much older than that.