CathInfo.com

Here's an easy do-it-yourself idea. Read the news story and then look at a flat earth map and the stop in Alaska makes perfect sense. Then look at a globe map and you will see the problem.

Amazing moment a woman gives birth to a premature baby girl at 30,000ft on a Taiwan to Los Angeles flight with crew and passengers helping out

A China Airlines flight landed in Alaska with an extra passenger after an expectant mother gave birth to a baby girl more than eight weeks early.
The Taiwan to Los Angeles flight was forced to make an emergency landing on Thursday after a Taiwanese passenger's waters broke six hours into the 19 hour journey.



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-3270382/Caught-camera-amazing-moment-woman-gives-birth-premature-baby-girl-30-000ft-Taiwan-Los-Angeles-flight-crew-passengers-helping-out.html

There are many, many emergency landings which make no sense on globe earth.  

Lots of videos showing them and interviewing flat earth pilots coming out of the closet are available for those who want to find them.

Pilots use the flat earth map in the cockpit.

Not really meant to prove anything, but Vibes of Cosmos has a new video showing his moon-earth maps in an Atlas form. Pretty cool

That's fascinating.  Thanks for posting.  One of the better ones I've seen on this  subject.  While it's not necessarily perfect (it seems to be some kind of reflection onto a surface (convex, concave, who knows?) ... but it's way too much of a coincidence not to be related somehow.  I'm not 100% sold on the "Terra Vista" thing, though I don't rule it out.  Those "Convex Earth" people from Latin America came to the same conclusion without invoking the "moon map" phenomenon.

I've absolutely never bought the BS about how we've seen the same face of the moon for centuries because it rotates at EXACTLY the same rate as it revolves around the earth.  That's just ludicrous.  Even if it were a second off per day, we've see significant changes on the face of the moon within years, not to mention decades and centuries.  Scientists claim that it gets a bit farther away from the earth every year, and in that case it would have to proportionally change its rate of rotation for the same face to keep pointing toward earth.  And eclipses happen because the sun is exactly both 400x larger and 400x more distant from the earth than the moon.  Who are they kiddding?  It's one big joke.

Then there was that astrophysicist from the 1950s or 1960s, Professor Foster, who asserted that he had undeniable proof that the moon was made of plasma and was not a solid body.

I don't mind at all, Miser. I'm flattered that you liked my wonderful work of art here well enough to save it

That being said, after watching the video that explains how the sunlight can't go over the curve, and even looking at my above drawing, I don't quite understand why it wouldn't be able to go over the curve. After all, if you can still see the top part of the sun, can't the top part cast light on the water?





Maybe I misunderstood your point?? I apologize if so.

Try it with a candle and a roll of paper towels.  :)