Next Council should be called Vatican II so that the AntiCouncil can be blotted out completely from the history of the Church.
That wouldn't work.
When a Robber Council is condemned its erstwhile name isn't used in the future for another one. The last time using a disgraced name was tried John XXIII is what we got. So the problem is amplified all the more, now.
What should be done is to re-convene Vatican I, which has never been closed. It was temporarily adjourned because of civil strife in Italy. And Vat.II was supposed to pick up where it left off, but we all know that A) that wasn't the intention of John XXIII when he opened his little pet project which he thought would be over in a month or two, and boy, was he wrong! And B) that wasn't the intention of the erstwhile sanctioned Liberals whose re-instatements were the doing of the same John XXIII, for not unrelated reasons beyond the scope of this post.
By re-convening Vatican I it would then be the first item of business to expunge Vat.II from the record and not even attempt to "fix it." Because what was written in Vat.II was not so much the problem as was the add-on that came with it, like a computer virus is carried not by the main message but by an ATTACHMENT. And the pernicious attachment to Vat.II was none other than the unclean spirit of Vat.II.
The unclean spirit of Vat.II has to be condemned.
The unclean spirit of Vat.II has to be condemned.
The unclean spirit of Vat.II has to be condemned.
And the way to condemn the unclean spirit of Vat.II is to draw a line through Vat.II.
.
Topic: VATICAN III ???!!!! (Read 3836 times)