Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Errors of Sedevacantism and Ecclesiastical Law  (Read 4275 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The Errors of Sedevacantism and Ecclesiastical Law
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2011, 11:04:19 AM »
Quote from: MyrnaM
Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
Man, Stevus just LOVES quoting John Salza, doesn't he? Regarding the article, I was interested to see what it had to say so I briefly took Stevus off ignore to read it. I think it has a few minor errors in it though. Like how he said that because the sedes believe JPII is an anti-pope that they follow the 1917 code. Sounds to me like he's saying most people who follow the 1917 code are sedes, or he just worded it wrong. Afterall, I'm not a sede and do not hold JPII as an anti-pope yet I follow the 1917 code and reject the 1983 one.


A true Catholic would wonder why anyone would pay mind to Salza, a 32 degree freemason anyway.


That is both ridiculous and uncharitable.  I suppose we should continually point out your past sins in order to negate whatever you might say.  And to say it as if in the present tense is grotesque calumny, as if no one can truly convert to the Catholic faith and renounce his errors.  Shame on you.    

The Errors of Sedevacantism and Ecclesiastical Law
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2011, 04:22:24 PM »
Myrna thinks Salza is still a secret mason, apparently. I do not think he is still involved in Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ. Do you really think Freemasons would let someone reveal all their secrets and beliefs in the form of criticism?


The Errors of Sedevacantism and Ecclesiastical Law
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2011, 05:47:09 PM »
Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
Myrna thinks Salza is still a secret mason, apparently. I do not think he is still involved in Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ. Do you really think Freemasons would let someone reveal all their secrets and beliefs in the form of criticism?


Your right SS, the Masons wouldn't stand for it, and many  have been murdered for less than what he supposed disclosed.  Of course he is still a Mason, continuing to destroy the Faith of Catholics.  

The devil is very clever and will try to sway anyone they could from the sedevacantist position, because the devil hates the truth.    

Salza, he discloses his own sins, he doesn't need any help from me.  

The Errors of Sedevacantism and Ecclesiastical Law
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2011, 08:17:20 PM »
Do you have any proof that he is still a mason? Because otherwise, it would be hard to believe he is still a mason and yet criticizes his own religion! And no offense towards you or your beliefs, but the sedevacantist position has never been proven as true. It's Traditional Catholicism that the devil tries to sway people away from. Once a person discovers Traditional Catholicism, I doubt the devil gives a flip whether or not they think we have a Pope. His main goal is to turn people away from the Church God established. Trads aren't going to be judged on whether or not they are a sedevacantist.

The Errors of Sedevacantism and Ecclesiastical Law
« Reply #14 on: June 05, 2011, 08:55:57 PM »
Quote from: MyrnaM
Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
Myrna thinks Salza is still a secret mason, apparently. I do not think he is still involved in Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ. Do you really think Freemasons would let someone reveal all their secrets and beliefs in the form of criticism?


Your right SS, the Masons wouldn't stand for it, and many  have been murdered for less than what he supposed disclosed.  Of course he is still a Mason, continuing to destroy the Faith of Catholics.  

The devil is very clever and will try to sway anyone they could from the sedevacantist position, because the devil hates the truth.    

Salza, he discloses his own sins, he doesn't need any help from me.  


Ah, the internet, where the birds of all colors meet to calumniate.  This from one who thought she could be considered a Successor to the Apostles.  The fact that your sins are hidden makes you worse.  You'll be known as the pious fraud from now on, your conversion a mere pretense.  If you are free to destroy a man's reputation at your slightest whim, then you should afford others to do the same to you.  It's only fair, isn't it?