https://x.com/MLJHaynes/status/1924385457766314017
Of course. What did anyone think, that he was going to declare Vatican II null?
That's what this new religion is about, ecuŠ¼enism, religious indifferentism, and the new soteriology (universal salvation and/or salvation by sincerity and nitheness).
He'd have the repudiate the entire Conciliar religion, and short of a miraculous conversion, it's not going to happen.
We have Tay-Tay Marshall just fawning all over the "liturgical" direction of Pervost, because he said something that sounded good to him about Eastern Rite liturgies.
Haven't all the Traditional Catholic clergy (at least in the early glory days) repeatedly preached that none of this is about the smells and the bells ... but about doctrine.
This dispute about Pervost really has to do with whether or not you consider the Conciliar Church to have just been the Catholic Church but veering off course to the Left ... and therefore are awaiting some course corrections back toward the right, and think that'll fix the problem. Or whether you believe that the Conciliar Church is substantially defective, rotten to the core ... where the only remedy is to declare Vatican II null and absolish the NOM (and for us SVs to also declare the Conciliar papal claimants to have been illegitimate ... while for the rest to anathematize them).
Bergoglio was given to the Trad, Inc. conservative Conciliars as a last chance gift by God to open their eyes, where it was giving them a chance to get out of the Conciliar Religion, realizing in Bergoglio what it was. Some (like +Vigano) cooperated with that grace. Others have snapped right back into line now that Leo is up there muttering a bit of Latin and using nicer vestments (which people of certain orientations are, BTW, naturally inclined toward anyway).
Topic: Leo (heresies starting to flow) (Read 17838 times)