Author Topic: Krah chose Williamsons lawyer (Read 35787 times)

Dawn · « **Reply #20 on:** November 30, 2010, 06:27:53 AM »

Emerentiana I agree with you. I have always thought there would be a split. Anymore I do not know. They will all make excuses for Fellay you wait and see. I really am rather worn out with the double-minedness of those who defend all things of The NewChurch all the time. From condoms to jews to masons. I think I am going to make a mini-retreat in my own home for Advent. Read St. Thomas of Aquinas and be at peace.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #21 on:** November 30, 2010, 07:15:38 AM »

I don't think there is any reason to panic. BF doesn't want Tradition linked to revisionism, nαzι groups, etc. It would mean the enemy wins. He's simply being prudent and cautious. BW is complying.

I think everyone is blowing this out of proportion. There is no reason for BF to sell out his life's work for nothing. Have some Faith. The enemy wants us to turn on each other. Divide and conquer.

Matthew · « **Reply #22 on:** November 30, 2010, 08:09:26 AM »

Quote from: Emerentiana

Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote
The attendees of this fundraising party are alumni of Tel Aviv University. They are raising scholarship funds to assist diasporan Jews to travel to the Zionist State of Israel to receive a formation at Tel Aviv University. Look at the photographs. Every single person is identified and every single one is clearly Jєωιѕн. There is no problem whatever with this, Krah included.

(is William of Norwitch being facetious?)

http://thoughtactioneire.blogspot.com/2010/11/maximilian-krah-and-menzingen-cause-for.html

If this story is true and this is the same Krah then Bishop Fellay could very well be under sinister influence.

Yeah, I would say that the SSPX is being infiltrated by the Zionists, and they are going for the kill!
They will get Bishop Williamson expelled, because he just doesnt fit into their agenda, being "antisemitic in his views.
At the same time they will pilfer the society of its funds!
Wow how diabolical can it be!
At the end of all of this there will be a spilt in the Society.
One group will go with the Vatican !! church and the other group will become sedevacantists.
No Catholic will be spared in this final assault by Satan to destroy whats left of the Church! Remember we are engaged in a BATTLE!

Two questions to ask:
Is Bishop Fellay so stupid he doesnt know about the Zionist plot to take over the world?
OR
Is he part of it......or did he sell out somewhere along the way!

Why is it that "Post-SSPX, there must be Sedevacantism"

How does it follow that a hypothetical sellout by +Fellay would lead to a conclusion that the Pope isn't pope?

The same goes for Telesphorus -- he's very disillusioned with the SSPX, and so he feels like Sedevacantism is staring him down, beckoning him over, while doesn't know that he wants to be there.

WHY??

Why couldn't the SSPX split where half merges with the Conciliar Church and the other half does what it's been doing the past 40 years?

It is because Sedevacantism is the only other traditional movement? Is it because acknowledging the pope would get that much more difficult -- humanly speaking -- after the Pope just made a (we're talking hypotheticals here) premature, false deal with the SSPX?

Matthew

Wessex · « **Reply #23 on:** November 30, 2010, 08:14:04 AM »

No, there has been a change in the Society. Maybe not just over a couple of events but in a general direction. I would say the few shows of conservatism in Rome and those stillborn doctrinal talks have turned the heads of the leadership as it has for some other groups. At the same time a spring cleaning operation has been going on to make the Society more acceptable to a less hardline conservative audience, to make it easier for some accommodation to be made with Rome and to avoid potention friction with secular authorities. In this respect it is logicial for the leadership to want to see the back of those it welcomed in the old days, including Bp. Williamson. ABL has long gone and Menzingen wants a new corporate image and will employ modern methods to achieve its new goal. The Society is not a democracy and one man can decide its fate without too much difficulty.

Matthew · « **Reply #24 on:** November 30, 2010, 08:15:46 AM »

By the way, I probably know more about the SSPX than Telesphorus -- good and bad. I was in their seminary for 3 1/3 years.

And let's just say he's not the only one whose personal life was touched by the SSPX.

But I continue to attend their chapels because I know that each priest is a different man, which means that some can be holy while others have serious issues. AND getting the Sacraments in an atmosphere where the entire Catholic Faith is preserved is very important. Likewise, now that I have a family, it's important that the sermons be sound and the Catholic Faith be taught inviolate.

About the only flaw at my current chapel is that a bunch of the parishioners like things the way they are, and they don't want to expand to a larger facility, even though visitors have to watch Mass on a TV set in the parish hall because there's no room for them in the chapel. Such visitors seldom come back a 2nd time. We're also in flagrant violation of fire codes seven ways from Sunday.

Apparently, for some old people, it's more important to have "stability" and comfortable routine than it is to save souls.

Matthew