Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc  (Read 139749 times)

1 Member and 31 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc
« Reply #600 on: July 13, 2026, 12:36:29 PM »
\

That's all you losers care about.

Rather than the Truth...

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc
« Reply #601 on: July 13, 2026, 12:38:38 PM »
Hi Tom, can you point out the similarities between the "r" in Letter #1 and the "r"s in Letter #2? Remember, you said they were written in the "same way".

These are your exact words from less than three hours ago, in case you already forgot:

I made a collage of all "r"s contained in the signatures that you can utilize to compare them. Posted above.

The same general manner of joining the r.
A persons handwriting can vary between moods, never mind their state of mind.

And speaking of that, I think it is important to remember his mental instability, which would have certainly have affected his handwriting.

But the general lines are the same.


Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc
« Reply #602 on: July 13, 2026, 12:41:19 PM »
I'm not sure what Tom is seeing.

I'm not sure what Tom is seeing smoking.

I think 'smoking' is the word.

Offline Everlast22

  • Supporter
Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc
« Reply #603 on: July 13, 2026, 12:45:14 PM »
That's all you losers care about.

Rather than the Truth...
You're actually the loser here - sperg posting like an autistic retard.

And you are not telling the truth.

Echoing red pill stuff you watched on youtube at 2 AM in the morning and spreading calumny is not the "truth".

If I find you in real life, you better hide, kiddo.



Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc
« Reply #604 on: July 13, 2026, 02:23:56 PM »
The same general manner of joining the r.

...

But the general lines are the same.

Can you explain what you mean by this? Because I very specifically pointed out how different the "joining" (ligature) of the "e" and "r" in Letter #1 is compared to the "e" and "r" in Letter #2:





Note how the ligature from "e" to "r" in Letter #1 (top left) creates an almost 90° angle, while the ligature from "e" to "r" in Letter #2 (top right, left of image) doesn't even come close to forming any sort of sharp angle

Could it be any more different? The connection from "e" to "r" in Letter #1 is a completely downward slope that almost forms a 90° angle with the first stroke of the "r". Two distinct lines. In Letter #2 the "e" to "r" is an almost completely upward slope that continues until it forms the first part of the "r". One continuous stroke.

Please, explain how they are joined in the "same general manner"