Author Topic: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc (Read 110531 times)

TomGubbinsKimmage · « **Reply #605 on:** **Yesterday** at 05:05:24 PM »

Quote from: Everlast22 on Yesterday at 12:45:14 PM

You're actually the loser here - sperg posting like an autistic retard.

And you are not telling the truth.

Echoing red pill stuff you watched on youtube at 2 AM in the morning and spreading calumny is not the "truth".

If I find you in real life, you better hide, kiddo.

Real hard guy on the internet.

TomGubbinsKimmage · « **Reply #606 on:** **Yesterday** at 05:12:20 PM »

Quote from: WorldsAway on Yesterday at 02:23:56 PM

Can you explain what you mean by this? Because I very specifically pointed out how different the "joining" (ligature) of the "e" and "r" in Letter #1 is compared to the "e" and "r" in Letter #2:

Could it be any more different? The connection from "e" to "r" in Letter #1 is a completely downward slope that almost forms a 90° angle with the first stroke of the "r". Two distinct lines. In Letter #2 the "e" to "r" is an almost completely upward slope that continues until it forms the first part of the "r". One continuous stroke.

Please, explain how they are joined in the "same general manner"

There are many other ways to write an "r" . I said same general way.

Thucists tend to have severe scruples among other things. Profounc trauma is probably at the cause of this. You gravitate to a mentally ill Bishop and do not want to step back to see how crazy it sounds that someone would want to fake this. Because reading any of Archbishop Lefebvres stuff and you can see how sane and balanced he was.

You expect normal people to believe that the True Faith was being kept with a fluctuating man who simulated Sacraments, said the Novus Ordo in the 80s (WE HAVE PHOTOS) and repented of his traditionalism.

What's next, are you going to claim the novus ordo photos are AI?

WorldsAway · « **Reply #607 on:** **Yesterday** at 05:26:39 PM »

Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Yesterday at 05:12:20 PM

There are many other ways to write an "r" . I said same general way.

You've gone from this (emphasis mine):

Quote

same way of writing "r"

To this:

Quote

The same general manner of joining the r.

To this:

Quote

There are many other ways to write an "r". I said same general way.

There are many ways of writing the letter "r"? Wow, profound insight, Tom! We know what you said, but the problem is what you said doesn't make any sense. Explain to us how the "r" in Letter #1 is written the "same way" (you said this), or "joined" in the "same general manner" (then said this), or written in the "same general way" (then said this) as the "r"s in Letter #2. I've asked you several times and you keep evading. You can use the collage I posted. Point it out for us..or you can just admit you were talking out of your ass, and that the "r" in Letter #1, and the way it is joined with the preceding "e" bears no resemblance to the "r"s in Letter #2

Everlast22 · « **Reply #608 on:** **Yesterday** at 06:09:06 PM »

Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Yesterday at 05:05:24 PM

Real hard guy on the internet.

Isn't that what you're tryin' to be?

you can't be more than 17 years old.

Incredulous · « **Reply #609 on:** **Yesterday** at 06:32:32 PM »

Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on Yesterday at 11:01:49 AM

Lol you are totally nuts.

This is Cabbage's diagnosis for everyone outside the controlled opposition, his "R&R weezistance."

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc (Read 110531 times)

TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc

TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc

WorldsAway

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc

Everlast22

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc

Incredulous

Re: Autobiography of Archbishop Thuc