Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]

Author Topic: The Synods Final Relatio: Adulterers in State of Grace!  (Read 5434 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neil Obstat

The Synods Final Relatio: Adulterers in State of Grace!
« Reply #40 on: November 03, 2015, 01:51:46 AM »
Quote from: Clemens Maria

Francis continues to use Scalfari as a platform despite Lombardi saying that there have been misquotes in the past.  What does that tell you?  Obviously, it is a way to give Francis plausible deniability.  Any time the uproar gets to be too intense they can say it is a misquote and Scalfari won't object because he will continue to get access to Francis.  A very nice quid pro quo.


Very nice, indeed.  I do think that's the best example I've ever seen of quid pro quo.

Thank you, Clemens Maria, for pointing that out!

.
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

The Synods Final Relatio: Adulterers in State of Grace!
« Reply #41 on: November 03, 2015, 04:13:23 AM »
Quote from: Nishant
You're better than this, 2Vermont. Your emotion is clouding your judgment. Since you made this about me and asked, I will answer you briefly - No, I'm a traditional Catholic who attends the SSPX currently. Beside the SSPX, I would attend only the FSSP, which also offers the true Mass. I believe in and advocate priests offering, and laity attending, the true Mass exclusively, but that doesn't mean I have given up on the mainstream Church, or the Pope and the Bishops. I have not. I believe - I know you disagree - that the best hope for the Church, humanly speaking, still remains a Tradition-leaning prelate like Burke being elected to the Papacy after Francis, I intend to pray and work for that. Beside SSPX Catholics, many of my good friends are Indultarians. If you really wish it, I can give you the name and the number of my SSPX priest privately to confirm my personal information. Nishant is also my real name, while your forum handle is of course not your name. I have never asked for it, nor complained about your relative anonymity. Xavier is my middle name. As far as I recall, I have never asked you an insulting question either - despite our disagreements mostly on sedevacantism - nor remember insulting you in any other way, unlike other posters here who did before you left. Anyway, I'll say no more.



Your wishful thinking (and I suspect the wishful thinking of your indult friends) is clouding your judgment. Your immediate sigh of relief because the Vatican denied Scalfari's remarks is what Novus Ordites do, not Catholics who are well aware of what the Vatican is capable of doing.  Quite honestly, I thought you were better than that.  Your explanation doesn't change my opinion of your reaction to the Vatican.  If I saw the post without your name, I would have thought poche had written it.  It is naïve at best.  
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
« previous next »