Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Anti-Vatican II GroupsPositions?  (Read 2873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anti-Vatican II GroupsPositions?
« Reply #15 on: November 02, 2015, 12:12:40 AM »
Quote from: JezusDeKoning
Quote from: Gregory I
ICK and FSSP shouldn't be up there. They don't disagree that Vatican II was a legitimate council, so they aren't anti Vatican II. They are Pro Hermeneutic of Continuity.


ICK and FSSP are BEYOND anti-Vatican II. They are saying the Traditional Latin Mass because they're anti-Vatican II. The clergy went to those institutions to be formed as seminarians, eventually tonsured and ordained because they're anti-Vatican II!

If they were pro-Vatican II, you know where they'd be? At some circular Protestant-looking church with guitar Masses, idol-worship of Bergoglio and a parking lot full of "Coexist" bumper stickers along with some sign for the fαɢɢօt alphabet soup.

You can't be pro-Vatican II AND pro-Tradition at the same time. One features some secular humanist in an oversized hoodie having &*$& Shabbos dinner on a Protestant table who wants Margaret Sanger and Harvey Milk to be canonized and the other is the True Catholic Faith, whole and inviolate for 2,000 years that CANNOT teach error. Pick one.


Then ask Fr. Berg if the FSSP as a society officially believes and teaches that Vatican II was not an act of the magisterium, but an abuse of authority.

Anti-Vatican II GroupsPositions?
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2015, 12:45:28 AM »
Quote from: rum
Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary (Fr. Feeney's group)
Sedevacantist
Recognize and Resist
FSSP
SSPX
SSPV
Sirist

Who else? For the purposes of the question, it doesn't matter to me if they recognize Vatican II as valid or not, just that they don't like it.


A Sirist Papacy until 1989 is evidenced by the White Sfumata, Vatican Radio and Pius XII, who blessed him.  :detective: