Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Alt-Right, Meet Rad-Trad  (Read 23187 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline rum

Re: Alt-Right, Meet Rad-Trad
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2018, 01:38:27 AM »

Any group that doesn't explicitly disallow Jews from participation will be controlled by Jews. The Jew Paul Gottfried, who has been called the father of the alt-right, has said that white-nationalism is good for the Jews. Anglin is a Jew fraud.

This stormfront thread by the guy who runs this website has some good info.

Re: Alt-Right, Meet Rad-Trad
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2018, 05:02:22 AM »
Any group that doesn't explicitly disallow Jews from participation will be controlled by Jews. The Jew Paul Gottfried, who has been called the father of the alt-right, has said that white-nationalism is good for the Jews. Anglin is a Jew fraud.

This stormfront thread by the guy who runs this website has some good info.
This is a good point I've been waiting for someone to bring up.  Yes, Gottfried is a Jew.  And what has the Alt-Right been about, if not the severing of ties with neoconservative Zionists?  And yet, there is Gottfried--a Jew--giving us the idea and naming it for us.  Is it coincidence, or conspiracy?  Will history be able to tell?  
I'll check out your article, thanks.


Re: Alt-Right, Meet Rad-Trad
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2018, 05:25:27 AM »
This stormfront thread by the guy who runs this website has some good info.
Holy.........moly.
https://thezog.info/who-controls-the-alternative-right/
Talk about being upended.  Interesting.

Re: Alt-Right, Meet Rad-Trad
« Reply #23 on: January 25, 2018, 08:13:16 AM »
Holy.........moly.
https://thezog.info/who-controls-the-alternative-right/
Talk about being upended.  Interesting.
Seriously.  This gives me pause.  
Rum, you still there?  Is this a sort of new development, and you're just ahead of the curve on this?

Re: Alt-Right, Meet Rad-Trad
« Reply #24 on: January 25, 2018, 09:26:39 AM »
I think the main problem with your characterization is that there is no objective definition to "alt-right".  The term is merely a derogatory term used to describe someone with whom the user disagrees and is intended to shut off any debate since any argument made by someone described as "alt-right" is, by definition, offensive.

I'm still not sure where the term originated, but it since positions that used to be mainstream political positions just a few years ago are now considered by many to be "alt-right", the term is useless.

In fact, it seems to me that the term, "alt-right", is merely the latest manifestation of "nαzι", "racist", "homophobe", etc., because those terms had been so overused as to have lost their meaning.  After a while you will likely not hear about the "alt-right" as that term loses it's intended reaction.