Author Topic: AGAIN Defending the False Assertion That SV Leads to the Disappearance of (Read 7669 times)

Exilenomore · « **Reply #20 on:** July 06, 2016, 01:52:57 PM »

Quote from: Lover of Truth

What bishop do you submit to?

Monseigneur Johan Bonny, per gratiam Apostolicae Sedis Antverpiae Episcopus.

You are completely unable to locate a sedevacantist hierarchy claiming to be in possession of episcopal sees, while the true Church must always be easily located.

Do you truly not see the contradictions of your teachings with those of the Church, or do you consciously refuse to submit to the truth?

Lover of Truth · « **Reply #21 on:** July 06, 2016, 02:10:46 PM »

Quote from: Exilenomore

Quote from: Lover of Truth
What bishop do you submit to?

Monseigneur Johan Bonny, per gratiam Apostolicae Sedis Antverpiae Episcopus.

You are completely unable to locate a sedevacantist hierarchy claiming to be in possession of episcopal sees, while the true Church must always be easily located.

Do you truly not see the contradictions of your teachings with those of the Church, or do you consciously refuse to submit to the truth?

Is he a valid Bishop with ordinary jurisdiction?

Again, the valid hierarchy with ordinary jurisdiction do not have to be SV. If you are going to accuse me of things make the accusation accurate.

Lover of Truth · « **Reply #22 on:** July 06, 2016, 02:14:54 PM »

Not this Bishop right?

https://www.ncronline.org/news/faith-parish/belgian-bishop-advocates-church-recognition-gαy-relationships

Exilenomore · « **Reply #23 on:** July 06, 2016, 02:44:19 PM »

Quote from: Lover of Truth

Is he a valid Bishop with ordinary jurisdiction?

Yes. I obey his legitimate commands, and oppose his heresies, as it is required.

Your bishops have valid episcopal orders, but no ordinary jurisdiction. They are episcopi vagi. I refer to you once again the Canon which I have cited in this very thread, and which you unfortunately ignore.

qeddeq · « **Reply #24 on:** July 06, 2016, 08:17:44 PM »

thanks for that link LoT. It ceases to surprise me that a sodomite apologist would hold the office of Bishop in newchurch. He's probably gαy himself and is a practicing sodomite. When Jesus defined marriage as between a man and a woman, and condemned sex outside of matrimony, he obviously meant to completely proscribe ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. If sex outside of marriage is impermissible, and marriage is only between a man and woman, then it follows as the night follows the day that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is never permissible. The words of christ won't stop newchurch though. Soon you'll see gαy lovers receiving communion, then you'll see them at the altar.
Exilenomore will be there, hard pressed, but ever loyal to the stench-church.