Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: AGAIN Defending the False Assertion That SV Leads to the Disappearance of  (Read 7651 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AGAIN Defending the False Assertion That SV Leads to the Disappearance of
« Reply #15 on: July 06, 2016, 12:45:04 PM »
-EDIT-

AGAIN Defending the False Assertion That SV Leads to the Disappearance of
« Reply #16 on: July 06, 2016, 12:49:10 PM »
Quote from: Lover of Truth
Did you miss my point that they did not have to be SV bishops in order to be valid and have ordinary jurisdiction?


Stop deflecting, and admit that Sedevacantism is false. You have been spamming this forum for years. The time has come to be a man and admit defeat.


AGAIN Defending the False Assertion That SV Leads to the Disappearance of
« Reply #17 on: July 06, 2016, 12:50:14 PM »
Quote from: Exilenomore
Quote from: Ladislaus
Theologians generally agree that the cessation of all ordinary jurisdiction would compromise the indefectibility of the Church.


Ladislaus,

This is simply not true. You are unable support this assertion with any evidence from trustworthy sources.

The Canon which I have cited in this thread proves that ordinary episcopal jurisdiction exists iure divino within the Church, and can thus never wane. Episcopi vagi are no teachers, doctors nor pastors of the Church; they are canonical lay men with valid sacramental orders, like the Eastern-Orthodox.


Here, believe it or not, I agree with Ladislaus.  There is plenty of evidence that would support his assertion but I will let him fend for himself.

Tell me there is not a single bishop with ordinary jurisdiction and I'll tell you the Church has defected.

AGAIN Defending the False Assertion That SV Leads to the Disappearance of
« Reply #18 on: July 06, 2016, 12:54:12 PM »
I had misread Ladislaus' post, and thought that he was saying that a cessation of ordinary jurisdiction would not compromise ecclesial indefectibility. I have edited my post and I apologise to him for the mistake.

It is one of my capital points that ordinary jurisdiction must always perdure within the Church, and that this proves the falsity of Sedevacantism.

AGAIN Defending the False Assertion That SV Leads to the Disappearance of
« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2016, 01:03:27 PM »
Quote from: Exilenomore
It is one of my capital points that ordinary jurisdiction must always perdure within the Church, and that this proves the falsity of Sedevacantism.


Your ipse dixit proves your ignorance.  What bishop do you submit to?