Which a vast majority of sedes and sedewhatevers are in agreement with, you mean.
Yeah, I think I did say once that all sedes hould be banned, in a moment of frustration. But I don't parrot the request. And I certainly would never say I'm going to stop posting until sedes are banned (as much as you might like that idea).
I'm going to continue to point things out which may be unpleasant for sedes and sedewhatevers. You can always put me on "ignore" if that's a problem.
I am not a sede at all and I agreed with banning Poche. He used intellectually dishonest arguments to support modernist ideas. He did this habitually and pertinaciously. Not only was this problematic in itself, it drove away many fine posters from this forum. Whatever one may think of Ladislaus, he did a good thing by drawing attention to the problem in a way that encouraged Matthew to reconsider it. We should be grateful to both of them and you would realize this if you were not blinded by personal dislike of Ladislaus.
While I would not say that you should be banned, Meg, it does seem strange to me that you continue to post here. It is a constant them of your posts that you are dissatisfied with this forum. You are continually complaining: There are too many sedes. Resistance views receive inadequate support. People prevent you from posting your ideas. (This last is patently false and yet I have seen you claim it multiple times.) I do not recall ever seeing another poster remain on a forum that he dislikes as much as you seem to dislike this one.
Topic: Poche is banned (Read 16103 times)