Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 33

Author Topic: Poche is banned  (Read 16092 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Poche is banned
« Reply #135 on: October 16, 2020, 09:04:20 AM »

Quote
I'm going to continue to point things out which may be unpleasant for sedes and sedewhatevers.

*obsessed*
Logged

Offline RomanCatholic1953

Re: Poche is banned
« Reply #136 on: October 16, 2020, 10:21:25 AM »
I believe Poche is also banned from fisheaters. And we put up with him for such as long time.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Poche is banned
« Reply #137 on: October 16, 2020, 11:50:17 AM »
Quote from: Meg on October 16, 2020, 05:40:38 AM
I'm going to continue to point things out which may be unpleasant for sedes and sedewhatevers. You can always put me on "ignore" if that's a problem.

What's most unpleasant about your posts is that you never actually make a rational argument, but simply dismiss the position and make derogatory comments.  We'll be arguing back and forth between R&R and sedes on a thread, and you'll just chime in with snide comments every few posts without actually addressing anything that's being written.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Poche is banned
« Reply #138 on: October 16, 2020, 11:52:07 AM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on October 16, 2020, 09:04:20 AM
*obsessed*

Yes, Meg suffers from SDS, Sedevacantist Derangement Syndrome.  She gets triggered at anything that might even imply a position similar to something a sedevacantist might say.  I adapted this from the term TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome, where the Left get immediately triggered by anything even remotely related to Trump.
Logged

Offline Matto

Re: Poche is banned
« Reply #139 on: October 16, 2020, 11:55:28 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on October 16, 2020, 11:50:17 AM
What's most unpleasant about your posts is that you never actually make a rational argument, but simply dismiss the position and make derogatory comments.  
Sedeprivationists are outside the Church. If R&R or Novusordoism is true they are obviously outside the Church, but if sedevacantism is true they are also outside the Church of sedevacantism. Don't risk your salvation to a crackpot position of one theologian and then adopted by a small minority of Thuc Bishops. And don't try to fall back on tradcuмenism. Your soul depends upon it. Abandon your Sanbornian buffoonerey and choose the Church of sedevacantism or the Church of Francis.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 33
« previous next »