Author Topic: Is one of the posters at fisheaters a transɛҳuąƖ? (Read 92723 times)

Rosarium · « **Reply #405 on:** July 01, 2013, 12:54:51 AM »

Vox Clamantis, this is about conveniences (convenient to live as a "gαy man") and sɛҳuąƖ activity, not psychological resolution.

Everything about this situation, from living in deception, dating men, wishing to "marry" men, is about fulfilling the lusts of the flesh.

This is legal under civil law now, the same law which seeks to destroy human life, destroy marriage, destroy the family, destroy the Church, and destroy our ability to live our Faith openly.

Even in non-Catholic nations, in recent times, this activity was seen as a public concern, and criminally sanctioned. The medical community considered such behaviour disordered, and worthy of treatment and control.

But now, the medical community is one of indulgence and convenience. The civil authority is about egalitarianism and destroying all real faith.

And now, those who profess traditional Catholicism are part of the same.

The damage is far beyond the individuals involved. It is a grave scandal to those who would seek the Faith at all. It is damaging to those who try to address the Crisis in the Church. It is damaging to those who look for guidance and truth.

Convenience and indulgence...that is the world. That is the way of the flesh, the way of death.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #406 on:** July 01, 2013, 08:17:26 AM »

Quote from: Rosarium

That site should be removed from the Internet, the owner put under Ecclesiastical Censure, and all those who took part should publicly reform and profess the truth.

"That site should be removed from the Internet, the owner put under Ecclesiastical Censure, and all those who took part should publicly reform and profess the truth.

Walty · « **Reply #407 on:** July 01, 2013, 10:02:46 AM »

Quote from: Mithrandylan

Of course, who cares even if it is real? Or who cares even if it's completely public? It's conciliar.

That's true, but this "secret docuмent which we must follow via dubious quotes from the National Catholic Reporter" nonsense is even more ludicrous than your average neoCatholic logic. At least neoCatholics are only confusing bad prelates for good ones, and not "Catholic" news sites for the Magisterium.

St George · « **Reply #408 on:** July 01, 2013, 10:46:03 AM »

Quote from: Elizabeth

Quote from: Rosarium

That site should be removed from the Internet, the owner put under Ecclesiastical Censure, and all those who took part should publicly reform and profess the truth.

"That site should be removed from the Internet, the owner put under Ecclesiastical Censure, and all those who took part should publicly reform and profess the truth.

Could you perhaps put that is a larger font so I can read it better?

Complain to her Archbishop if you want, but expect nothing to happen.

ggreg · « **Reply #409 on:** July 01, 2013, 04:13:25 PM »

Quote from: Jaynek

Quote from: Mithrandylan

He is a man who wants to be a woman, is attracted to men, and romantically involved in them, and has said all of the above on FE. I don't get it. What's different now where all of a sudden he's 'in bad faith?' Why is what we found even a surprise? It matches what he's already made known about himself perfectly.

I thought he was really trying to be a good Catholic I thought he was attracted to men but resisting it.

So when he said he dated men and hoped one day (when the sex change operation was complete) to "marry a man", which he did fairly early on in the I'm coming out thread, how did you conclude that was "resisting it" ?