To whatever extent I implied or otherwise contended that it is contrary to doctrine to contend that a person could be resurrected after Christ's Resurrection and before the General Judgment, I retract. This is still a lousy proof against BoD, but I have been considering and studying the matter of resurrection in greater detail since it came up, and I am no longer as convinced as I was that it is radically impossible as such.
Thumbs up for rigor, integrity, and honesty, regardless of remaining points of contention.
For what it is worth and strictly speaking, I don't see either, pro/con, being
proof of anything at least in a
directly theological sense.
If otherwise, then please someone show me/us where pious stories are material, at least
directly, for theological inquiry.
The do have
evidentiary value as to what was/n't generally believed at least at a certain time and place, no?