Author Topic: Feeneyism (Read 6858 times)

Charles · « **on:** January 14, 2011, 02:47:39 PM »

My head spins every time I try to sort it out.

How can someone say Fr Feeney was wrong, and then so passionately argue against post VII ecuмenism ?

umblehay anmay · « **Reply #1 on:** January 14, 2011, 02:58:09 PM »

According to Bishop Dolan, it was the confusion created by Fr. Feeney that allowed the false ecuмenism of Vatican II to happen. Sorry if that makes your head spin even faster.

GregorianChat · « **Reply #2 on:** January 14, 2011, 03:03:36 PM »

Charles,
That's so funny, assuming you are talking about bob and bod, my head spins everytime I try to sort it out.

How can someone who says Fr. Feeney was right, so passionately argue that post VII ecuмenism is the same thing?

Charles · « **Reply #3 on:** January 14, 2011, 03:11:58 PM »

Well, really, think about it.

Isn't another Assisi gathering planned ? How can one argue that's a bad idea, and then propose Fr Feeney was wrong ?

Deliveringit1 · « **Reply #4 on:** January 14, 2011, 05:06:14 PM »

Charles, you make a an excellent point. Many in this Forum claim to be "Traditional Catholics" while at the same time rejecting a strict understanding of EENS and also rejecting the necessity of Water Baptism as the only means to become a member within God's Church.

So it makes one wonder,... since these so called self proclaimed "Traditional Catholics" agree with the Novus Ordo Modernism(ie- Baptism of Desire), then what exactly makes them think they are "Traditional Catholics"?