Author Topic: Feeneyism (Read 6841 times)

GregorianChat · « **Reply #5 on:** January 14, 2011, 07:27:44 PM »

Quote from: Charles

Well, really, think about it.

Isn't another Assisi gathering planned ? How can one argue that's a bad idea, and then propose Fr Feeney was wrong ?

Personally, I'm not concerned what the Vatican II Modernist church does. I still don't see the connection.
Do you like this Assisi gathering?

roscoe · « **Reply #6 on:** January 14, 2011, 08:42:06 PM »

Quote from: Charles

Well, really, think about it.

Isn't another Assisi gathering planned ? How can one argue that's a bad idea, and then propose Fr Feeney was wrong ?

Who is advocating Assissi was wrong and at the same time trashing Fr Feeney?

Dolan somehow pinning v2 on Fr Feeney is from Alice In Wonderland.

Charles · « **Reply #7 on:** January 14, 2011, 08:42:50 PM »

Quote from: GregorianChat

Quote from: Charles
Well, really, think about it.

Isn't another Assisi gathering planned ? How can one argue that's a bad idea, and then propose Fr Feeney was wrong ?

Personally, I'm not concerned what the Vatican II Modernist church does. I still don't see the connection.
Do you like this Assisi gathering?

Assisi ? I think it was a dark day for the Church. And I think false ecuмenism should be passionately opposed.

I just think of Fr Feeney when I think of EENS. I'm 90% convinced he was right, but about 10% he might have been wrong. :confused1:

Charles · « **Reply #8 on:** January 14, 2011, 09:07:11 PM »

Quote from: Deliveringit1

Charles, you make a an excellent point. Many in this Forum claim to be "Traditional Catholics" while at the same time rejecting a strict understanding of EENS and also rejecting the necessity of Water Baptism as the only means to become a member within God's Church.

So it makes one wonder,... since these so called self proclaimed "Traditional Catholics" agree with the Novus Ordo Modernism(ie- Baptism of Desire), then what exactly makes them think they are "Traditional Catholics"?

:sign-surrender:

I agree with your understanding of EENS, but I just popped back in here and posted on a whim after seeing Mathew's poem.

I see the other thread now ... obviously you've been busy there lol.

My question wasn't to find fault in a stance by a forum member. I'm just trying to figure out why a strict interpretation of EENS, sans loopholes, is incorrect. And isn't the interpretation of EENS itself the basis to reject false ecuмenism ?

Doesn't all our ammo against false ecuмenism find EENS at face value as the source ? Feeney style, sans the loopholes and claims of ignorance ?

That's what I'm getting at, but if it's a distorted view, I'm all ears.

Charles · « **Reply #9 on:** January 14, 2011, 09:10:42 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

Quote from: Charles
Well, really, think about it.

Isn't another Assisi gathering planned ? How can one argue that's a bad idea, and then propose Fr Feeney was wrong ?

Who is advocating Assissi was wrong and at the same time trashing Fr Feeney?

Dolan somehow pinning v2 on Fr Feeney is from Alice In Wonderland.

No one was, see my post above this one for what I was getting at.