Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?  (Read 12085 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Änσnymσus

  • Guest
Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
« Reply #45 on: December 27, 2023, 05:12:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Women also paint their fingernails and wear rings. Are men aroused by the sight of female hands?
    As of yet, I've never heard of such thing as a hand fetish. So no, probably not. 

    But at the same time women don't really adorn their hands now do they?

    If a woman came to mass with her hands like this I might have something to say. Anyway, all of this absurdity is just another argument for men to be strong and decide what their wives wear. Otherwise women turn Sunday Mass into shameful pageantry.








    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #46 on: December 27, 2023, 05:22:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As of yet, I've never heard of such thing as a hand fetish. So no, probably not.
    Don't google it. More stuff I didn't need to know. :( :facepalm: :laugh1: what a world...



    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #47 on: December 27, 2023, 05:32:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No. A down-vote for Aleah herself.
    That's so petty it is hilarious!:laugh2:

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #48 on: December 27, 2023, 05:55:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That's so petty it is hilarious!:laugh2:
    Edgar must still be holding a grudge...

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #49 on: January 01, 2024, 08:28:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Stop oggling women's feet and keep your eyes in your own missal. :facepalm:


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #50 on: January 02, 2024, 01:39:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I find feet 'disgusting' not sure why but it's something that isn't 'clean' as you walk on them constantly. If anything shoes on a women can be more appealing than barefeet.
    Feet ugly?  Why?  I’ve always taken good care of my feet, wash, use pumice stone if they get calloused, wear well-fitting shoes and hose for comfort and health, not fashion.  In summer I go barefoot or don flip flops for casual wear. In winter, I wear toe socks around the house.  At age 64, my feet have no callouses, no bunions, no hammertoes, blisters, or misshapen toes.  No ingrown, too thick, or fungus or the nails.  I got athlete’s foot long ago and from a college dormitory shower and promptly treated and got rid of it.  I certainly do not have Darwinian feet like the hairy ones shown in the picture earlier in this thread.  I have never been to a podiatrist because there is no need for his services.  My feet are lovely compared with those of most women my age.  
    Nonetheless, I will not post a photo or identify myself lest I run into the OP and cause him to lose his soul!  

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #51 on: January 02, 2024, 08:17:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • :laugh1:

    Are these modest enough:


    I hope this image isn't a temptation for Yeti. ;)
    :laugh1::laugh1::laugh1::laugh1:

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #52 on: January 02, 2024, 08:20:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don’t care about hosiery or no hosiery. But I’m just going to say it: high heels are not tasteful footwear especially for Mass. 


    Offline jvk

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 722
    • Reputation: +688/-17
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #53 on: March 08, 2024, 10:21:54 AM »
  • Thanks!7
  • No Thanks!2
  • I can't believe there's really 4 pages dedicated to whether or not women should wear hosiery or if bare legs are ok when attending Mass.

    I can't believe I read all of it!

    Perhaps we should debate the merits of men wearing white socks vs black with their Sunday pants?  Why pick on women all the time?

    Sheesh.  

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31264
    • Reputation: +27191/-495
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #54 on: March 08, 2024, 12:21:33 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Women should dress modestly for Mass.

    "heels" were invented by men, to cause a woman to walk differently, in such a way that it accentuates a woman's butt -- it exaggerates her natural hip movement.

    First of all, keep in mind that women are different from men in FAR MORE WAYS than mere "how they use the bathroom". For starters, women have different hip structure, this design by God obviously had childbearing in mind.

    A woman walks differently than a man, due to how her hips are much broader. There is a hip movement there, a slight rocking or swaying of the butt, that doesn't happen with men at all.

    Guess what? That natural butt movement is amplified when she wears high heeled shoes a.k.a. "high heels".

    Just stating facts here -- YOU WOMEN go ahead and decide if you want to wear high heels, KNOWING what's going on in your caboose area every time you take a step.

    By the way, "walking like a woman" is one of the ways gαys try to play make-believe. They really have to work at it, and it comes off exaggerated and unnatural, just like the way they talk.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline ElwinRansom1970

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 764
    • Reputation: +513/-94
    • Gender: Male
    • γνῶθι σεαυτόν - temet nosce
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #55 on: March 08, 2024, 12:52:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • A woman walks differently than a man, due to how her hips are much broader. There is a hip movement there, a slight rocking or swaying of the butt, that doesn't happen with men at all.
    Matthew, clearly you have not seen recently the walk of many Novus Ordo bishops in these USA. They most definitely have swaying posteriors as they strut to and from their eucharistic tables.
    "I distrust every idea that does not seem obsolete and grotesque to my contemporaries."
    Nicolás Gómez Dávila


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #56 on: March 08, 2024, 01:38:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • They most definitely have swaying posteriors as they strut to and from their eucharistic tables.

    For some (of the light-in-the-loafers sort), under conscious musculoskeletal control. For others, adiposity has its own spontaneous wave function.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #57 on: March 08, 2024, 02:24:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "heels" were invented by men, to cause a woman to walk differently, in such a way that it accentuates a woman's butt -- it exaggerates her natural hip movement.
    WRONG..."heels" were invented by men FOR MEN !
     
    "Heeled shoes were originally worn by men, and have been found in the histories of 10th century Persian and 3500 BC Egyptian life. While this style of footwear was originally geared towards the needs of men, the 18th century saw women begin to adopt high heels into their fashion."

    "High heels were used in 10th century Persia for men. These shoes were used for cavalry men and enabled them to maintain stability while standing in the stirrups."

    https://themoderndirectory.com/education/the-history-of-high-heels/



    A woman walks differently than a man, due to how her hips are much broader. There is a hip movement there, a slight rocking or swaying of the butt, that doesn't happen with men at all.

    Guess what? That natural butt movement is amplified when she wears high heeled shoes a.k.a. "high heels".
    Wrong again.  When a woman wears heels her posture becomes more upright (you can't slouch in heels) she walks with her legs closer together and her steps are of a shorter length.  Perhaps it is because of the short steps that YOU think her hips are swaying in an exaggerated way.

    Some nun's in full habit before Vat II wore 2 inch heels and they walked VERY demurely.
    Below is a picture of Sister Camille of the School Sisters of Notre Dame in heels.



    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31264
    • Reputation: +27191/-495
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #58 on: March 08, 2024, 03:20:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm not "wrong".

    High heels are immodest, in the same way tight-fitting pants, low-cut tops, short skirts, or see-thru material is immodest. 

    They accentuate things that should be hidden by modest clothing.


    • Women’s breasts look larger. High heels cause the back to over-arch, which thrusts the breasts forward, making them appear larger and more prominent. Many studies have shown that prominent breasts attract more male attention.
    • Women’s buttocks appear larger because they are lifted in heels. Some research indicates that as perceived buttock size increases, men feel more attracted to women.
    • While walking in heels, women’s hips and buttocks sway more because heels shorten women’s gait.
    • Women’s feet look smaller. While there are men who feel attracted to all manner of women—thin, heavy, short, tall—men evolved to be generally bigger and taller than women, and to feel attracted to women who are more petite than they are. High heels make women’s feet look more petite and, therefore, more attractive.

    But this increased desirability comes at significant cost: High heels are uncomfortable and substantially increase risk of foot soreness, blisters, bunions, falls, ankle sprains, plantar fasciitis, ingrown toenails, nerve damage in the feet and legs, and knee and back pain.


    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201612/the-uncanny-psychology-high-heels
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 42179
    • Reputation: +24126/-4346
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Were women allowed to wear heels with no hosiery to Mass before?
    « Reply #59 on: March 08, 2024, 03:24:35 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • WRONG..."heels" were invented by men FOR MEN !

    Meh, those examples (except for a couple examples of royalty ... who appeared rather effeminate themselves) entailed heels used for utilitarian purposes, primarily to keep their feet in stirrups while riding horses.  We're clearly talking about their use among average people for esthetic purposes.