Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife  (Read 182453 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DZ PLEASE

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2928
  • Reputation: +741/-787
  • Gender: Male
Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
« Reply #165 on: October 25, 2017, 04:04:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is a question of justice.

    The implementation of justices is ALWAYs going to be imperfect because we are SINNERS.
    Even granting that, I don't think that you've followed the figurative breadcrumbs all the way home in this instance.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #166 on: October 25, 2017, 04:04:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • But clearly have the need to misrepresent others arguments because you don't want to accept Church teaching.

    What Church teaching am I required to accept? One that is hidden?


    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47962
    • Reputation: +28343/-5306
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #167 on: October 25, 2017, 04:10:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It is your job to support any assertions that you make in a debate.  If you do not support them, people will assume that you are not able to.

    After you.  You made the unsbustantiated gratuitous assertion that the "subjection" of woman to man after Original Sin was just made "more difficult" rather than causing a new state that was itself the punishement.  So you prove YOUR assertion first.  I love how you try to impose criteria on me that you yourself don't abide by.  That's self-serving hypocrisy.  You prove that "subjection" existed before Original Sin citing sources.

    Secondly, it is not my "job" to do anything on this forum.  I am not required to prove anything to you.  I am not required to take two hours of my time to dig up all the quotes from the Church Fathers about this state of subjection.  Look it up yourself so that you can correct your error on this matter.  I've read the Church Fathers and know what they taught.

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #168 on: October 25, 2017, 04:13:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  These sorts of accusations give the impression that you have run out of good arguments for your position.
    It would be helpful for you to quote/cite/link said arguments for the sake of acknowledgement, rigor, clarity and, hopefully, resolution. 

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #169 on: October 25, 2017, 04:18:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No your priest will tell you when you ask him. I have been very open that I just don't have the book to hand, because I don't even own it. Because if I did most editions are in Latin.

    So stop trolling the thread pretending that this is some inaccessible teaching.
    It is not. It's right there in the books. One phone call to your priest will solve it.

    call 1800-PRIEST.

    I'm not going to ask a priest. It's up to you to prove that what you assert is Church teaching. It shouldn't be difficult to point to a source that can easily be verified. 

    You have failed to prove anything. 


    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #170 on: October 25, 2017, 04:20:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • :facepalm:

    Mortalium Animos is about false ecuмenism and has nothing to do with this subject.

    So, tell me, what was it back in the day?  LSD? Cocaine?
    You are correct, at least broadly speaking, if you mean that it has nothing in particular to to with this topic, however:
    1. Since when has that stopped any here?
    2. Please read that quoted including that to which it was a response again(?),  very carefully and bearing in mind that I have both tentatively ceded your point, and was already aware of this time of initial post.

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #171 on: October 25, 2017, 04:21:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Why don't you cite the relevant part of Mortalium Animos, where it says that corporal punishment may be used on a wife by a husband?
    Just forget it.

    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4170
    • Reputation: +2318/-1232
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #172 on: October 25, 2017, 04:39:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • After you.  You made the unsbustantiated gratuitous assertion that the "subjection" of woman to man after Original Sin was just made "more difficult" rather than causing a new state that was itself the punishement.  So you prove YOUR assertion first.  I love how you try to impose criteria on me that you yourself don't abide by.  That's self-serving hypocrisy.  You prove that "subjection" existed before Original Sin citing sources.
    Quote
    Summa Theologica, First Part, Question 92, Article 1

    Subjection is twofold. One is servile, by virtue of which a superior makes use of a subject for his own benefit; and this kind of subjection began after sin. There is another kind of subjection which is called economic or civil, whereby the superior makes use of his subjects for their own benefit and good; and this kind of subjection existed even before sin. For good order would have been wanting in the human family if some were not governed by others wiser than themselves. So by such a kind of subjection woman is naturally subject to man, because in man the discretion of reason predominates. Nor is inequality among men excluded by the state of innocence, as we shall prove
    Quote
    St. Augustine, Marriage and Concupiscence, Bk 1, Ch 10

    “Nor can it be doubted, that it is more consonant with the order of nature that men should bear rule over women, than women over men. It is with this principle in view that the apostle says, ‘The head of the woman is the man;’ and, ‘Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands.’ So also the Apostle Peter writes: ‘Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord.’”
    Quote
    John Chrysostom, Homilies on Ephesians 5:22

    “Then after saying, ‘The husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is of the Church,’ he further adds, ‘and He is the Saviour of the body.’ For indeed the head is the saving health of the body. He had already laid down beforehand for man and wife, the ground and provision of their love, assigning to each their proper place, to the one that of authority and forethought, to the other that of submission. As then ‘the Church,’ that is, both husbands and wives, ‘is subject unto Christ, so also ye wives submit yourselves to your husbands, as unto God.’ For she is the body, not to dictate to the head, but to submit herself and obey.”


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #173 on: October 25, 2017, 05:28:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Do whatever is noble and godly, living in the Presence of Christ. Certainly hitting one's wife is not noble, instead it dishonors her and any children witnessing such actions leading them to hit their own wives when they reach marriageable age. Indeed, we can act like immature brats, and swat our wives whenever they displease us, but there will be eternal consequences for our immature behavior.


    We can justify our immaturity and use all the PROOF TEXTS from the saints to support our pitiful arguments, but if we have not love in our hearts, it will profit us nothing for St. Peter will never listen to proof texts, but he will discern what is in our hearts, for we are all called to be saints, to exercise prudence, love, generosity, temperance, kindness, meekness, humility, and forgiveness of failings.


    Do not forget the words of St. Paul in 1 Cor. 13  [Douay-Rheims] 




    IF I speak with the tongues of men, and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And if I should have prophecy and should know all mysteries, and all knowledge, and if I should have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. And if I should distribute all my goods to feed the poor, and if I should deliver my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.

    Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil; Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth with the truth; Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #174 on: October 25, 2017, 05:38:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Do whatever is noble and godly, living in the Presence of Christ. Certainly hitting one's wife is not noble, instead it dishonors her and any children witnessing such actions leading them to hit their own wives when they reach marriageable age. Indeed, we can act like immature brats, and swat our wives whenever they displease us, but there will be eternal consequences for our immature behavior.


    We can justify our immaturity and use all the PROOF TEXTS from the saints to support our pitiful arguments, but if we have not love in our hearts, it will profit us nothing for St. Peter will never listen to proof texts, but he will discern what is in our hearts, for we are all called to be saints, to exercise prudence, love, generosity, temperance, kindness, meekness, humility, and forgiveness of failings.


    Do not forget the words of St. Paul in 1 Cor. 13  [Douay-Rheims]  




    IF I speak with the tongues of men, and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. And if I should have prophecy and should know all mysteries, and all knowledge, and if I should have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. And if I should distribute all my goods to feed the poor, and if I should deliver my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.

    Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not, dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; Is not ambitious, seeketh not her own, is not provoked to anger, thinketh no evil; Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth with the truth; Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
    Perhaps, in "charity", so as not to deal perversely and please don't be provoked to anger or to think ill by the request, but if you would please bear with me and endure the request of a donation of your name?

    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4170
    • Reputation: +2318/-1232
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #175 on: October 25, 2017, 06:11:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I for one don't have the book to hand as I mentioned earlier. Any good trad priest can confirm it is in there.
    I was able to find an old moral theology manual online:here 
    It is called A Synopsis of the Moral Theology of Peter Dens written in 1838.

    It has a section on "Is it lawful for a husband to whip his wife?"  It says, in part, 
    Quote
    As for moderate whipping it may be permitted, if the wife is much in fault, and there is no hope that she may be corrected in any other way; but this case is very rare.
    I see no reason to doubt the claims that this idea is part of traditional Catholic moral theology.


    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #176 on: October 25, 2017, 06:12:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Perhaps, in "charity", so as not to deal perversely and please don't be provoked to anger or to think ill by the request, but if you would please bear with me and endure the request of a donation of your name?
    It's just me again.

    Änσnymσus

    • Guest
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #177 on: October 25, 2017, 06:17:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was able to find an old moral theology manual online:here
    It is called A Synopsis of the Moral Theology of Peter Dens written in 1838.

    It has a section on "Is it lawful for a husband to whip his wife?"  It says, in part, I see no reason to doubt the claims that this idea is part of traditional Catholic moral theology.
    The term moderate is up for grabs.
    What is moderate to one man (40 lashes of a whip) can kill.
    A man is much stronger than his wife and can inflict mortal wounds especially if the woman screams in pain.
    Sometimes even the primate screams can arose an animal instinct in a psychopath and encourage him to kill his prey.

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #178 on: October 25, 2017, 06:18:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's just me again.
    It's funny the first few times, perhaps.

    The words are true, even if made to sound hollow.

    Offline Jaynek

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4170
    • Reputation: +2318/-1232
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Proper Punishment for a Disobedient Wife
    « Reply #179 on: October 25, 2017, 06:29:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The term moderate is up for grabs.
    What is moderate to one man (40 lashes of a whip) can kill.
    A man is much stronger than his wife and can inflict mortal wounds especially if the woman screams in pain.
    Sometimes even the primate screams can arose an animal instinct in a psychopath and encourage him to kill his prey.
    Given that the Church recognized that a husband has a right to use corporal punishment on his wife (and I think there is overwhelming evidence for this) we can then consider what are the limits on that right.

    But they are two separate questions:  Does the right exist, in principle?  What is the proper way to implement it?  We need to determine the answer to the first question first before we can answer the second.

    The fact that there are cases of excessive use of force against wives tells us nothing about what the Church teaches about the husband's authority.